Of course, adverse possession presumes that land ought to be made "useful." (Haven't thought yet about how these critiques of real property theory map to IP.) Much of real property theory arose from the assumption that…
Counter-argument: Adverse possession is justified by the scarcity of real property. Which does not apply to IP. - Real property (i.e. land) is a scarce and limited resource. If a party is making productive use of the…
Of course, adverse possession presumes that land ought to be made "useful." (Haven't thought yet about how these critiques of real property theory map to IP.) Much of real property theory arose from the assumption that…
Counter-argument: Adverse possession is justified by the scarcity of real property. Which does not apply to IP. - Real property (i.e. land) is a scarce and limited resource. If a party is making productive use of the…