Nicely written up but superficial analysis and trite conclusions. It would be nice if someone took this comparative analysis of programming languages a little more seriously and go beyond the tiresome "should a…
The public must Miranda the cops now. "Everything you say..." etc.
I think this is more related to inadvertent vs. intentional recording. For example, you can inadvertently record someone who is shouting at you if you were on the phone, leaving a voicemail message.
Freemand Dyson has another objection to climate modelling: it does not take into account the way climate interacts with biomass. Simple calculations show that even small changes in global biomass absorb huge amounts of…
If languages are designed "by men for men" then I suppose we need some women-designed languages to embody 'horizontal thinking' and all that.
Wegner is not the best example for 'not a crackpot' though.
He basically says that the UTM cannot run a TM in real time, so that makes it non-universal. It's pretty inane.
Nicely written up but superficial analysis and trite conclusions. It would be nice if someone took this comparative analysis of programming languages a little more seriously and go beyond the tiresome "should a…
The public must Miranda the cops now. "Everything you say..." etc.
I think this is more related to inadvertent vs. intentional recording. For example, you can inadvertently record someone who is shouting at you if you were on the phone, leaving a voicemail message.
Freemand Dyson has another objection to climate modelling: it does not take into account the way climate interacts with biomass. Simple calculations show that even small changes in global biomass absorb huge amounts of…
If languages are designed "by men for men" then I suppose we need some women-designed languages to embody 'horizontal thinking' and all that.
Wegner is not the best example for 'not a crackpot' though.
He basically says that the UTM cannot run a TM in real time, so that makes it non-universal. It's pretty inane.