justinjlynn: Yes, they are violating the copyright license. Yes they should be sued. Perens and his lawyers are correct.
Redhat distributes it's sources to everyone, thus making any violation of the no-restrictions-on-redistribution clause acedemic to the linux copyright holders who would be the claimants. GRSecurity successfully prevents…
That is not a "work around". That is a BLATANT in-writing VIOLATION of the no-restrictions-on-redistribution clause GRSecurity MUST follow in-order to have the PERMISSION to create derivative works. GRSecurity IS…
They are blatantly violating the copyrights of the linux licensors, as far as we know. The linux licensors should sue. Another option is to simply revoke the license: Brad Spengler has (as far as we know) a gratis…
GRSecurity is violating the GPL, and thus violating the linux programmers copyrights, as Bruce Perens explained: https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/09/188246/bruce-peren...…
justinjlynn: Yes, they are violating the copyright license. Yes they should be sued. Perens and his lawyers are correct.
Redhat distributes it's sources to everyone, thus making any violation of the no-restrictions-on-redistribution clause acedemic to the linux copyright holders who would be the claimants. GRSecurity successfully prevents…
That is not a "work around". That is a BLATANT in-writing VIOLATION of the no-restrictions-on-redistribution clause GRSecurity MUST follow in-order to have the PERMISSION to create derivative works. GRSecurity IS…
They are blatantly violating the copyrights of the linux licensors, as far as we know. The linux licensors should sue. Another option is to simply revoke the license: Brad Spengler has (as far as we know) a gratis…
GRSecurity is violating the GPL, and thus violating the linux programmers copyrights, as Bruce Perens explained: https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/09/188246/bruce-peren...…