Distorting the economy is a real issue and should be talked about. There is way too much front-loading of hiring strategies and infrastructure that happens on future (over-)promised capabilities, TAM and profitability…
They don't. That's why you'll only hear growth metrics like ARR and not "sustainability" metrics like user retention.
It's a weird graph... It's specifically tokens per GPU but the x-axis is "interactivity per second", so the y-axis is including Blackwell being twice the size and also the increase from fp8 -> fp4, note it will needs to…
I'd think it's just a fine-tuned Llama model with Twitter content in a vectordb...
Is this itself Psyops? ;)
You just made a point for redundancy ie more sensors... Sensor failures are independent events and need to be correctly identified no matter what. To take Lidar and Vision, both say something about distance and form of…
Idk why people have the preconception of two (or more) sensors each deciding on an outcome indepently.. Suppose you have a color sensor and a form sensor and you have to identify an orange (fruit). Clearly in conjuction…
And there is land infrastructure in place for autolanding, aiming localization etc.. Much different from roads.
It's not really slower. It's comparable, with some clear benefits. But yeah, reality is caching up. Apple is performance-wise matching their competitors (was clear from how they positioned m1 products that this would be…
It is a general theme, people say how they are switching their specced out 2019 16inch MBP to these new M1 Macbooks, then getting all upset when people point out, they are probably not the professionals the top-end MBPs…
Given that the M1 is a full node ahead of Zen 3 and two nodes ahead of whatever Intel has to offer, one would think that when on same node, Intel and AMD will be just as capable. But the truth is comparing to future…
Distorting the economy is a real issue and should be talked about. There is way too much front-loading of hiring strategies and infrastructure that happens on future (over-)promised capabilities, TAM and profitability…
They don't. That's why you'll only hear growth metrics like ARR and not "sustainability" metrics like user retention.
It's a weird graph... It's specifically tokens per GPU but the x-axis is "interactivity per second", so the y-axis is including Blackwell being twice the size and also the increase from fp8 -> fp4, note it will needs to…
I'd think it's just a fine-tuned Llama model with Twitter content in a vectordb...
Is this itself Psyops? ;)
You just made a point for redundancy ie more sensors... Sensor failures are independent events and need to be correctly identified no matter what. To take Lidar and Vision, both say something about distance and form of…
Idk why people have the preconception of two (or more) sensors each deciding on an outcome indepently.. Suppose you have a color sensor and a form sensor and you have to identify an orange (fruit). Clearly in conjuction…
And there is land infrastructure in place for autolanding, aiming localization etc.. Much different from roads.
It's not really slower. It's comparable, with some clear benefits. But yeah, reality is caching up. Apple is performance-wise matching their competitors (was clear from how they positioned m1 products that this would be…
It is a general theme, people say how they are switching their specced out 2019 16inch MBP to these new M1 Macbooks, then getting all upset when people point out, they are probably not the professionals the top-end MBPs…
Given that the M1 is a full node ahead of Zen 3 and two nodes ahead of whatever Intel has to offer, one would think that when on same node, Intel and AMD will be just as capable. But the truth is comparing to future…