modern Java is great. But this article makes me really appreciate the class and struct features of C++
> All of the language differences between .NET and Java fall in this "non-consensus" zone Curious if you think fibers vs async/await is still in this zone (amongst experts). It seems fibers are objectively better. But…
some of the STL is easy to improve on. For example, std::unordered_map performs poorly due to pointer stability requirements in the standard. Most performance sensitive C++ codebases will use something like abseil's…
> to more performant runtimes and architectures in response to operational concerns at scale, which have a tenuous link to language The runtime performance and the language are deeply linked. None of the dynamically…
Hi Nikita. Can you share any of Neon's techniques for minimizing noisy neighbor issues in the multi tenant storage services? Thanks!
modern Java is great. But this article makes me really appreciate the class and struct features of C++
> All of the language differences between .NET and Java fall in this "non-consensus" zone Curious if you think fibers vs async/await is still in this zone (amongst experts). It seems fibers are objectively better. But…
some of the STL is easy to improve on. For example, std::unordered_map performs poorly due to pointer stability requirements in the standard. Most performance sensitive C++ codebases will use something like abseil's…
> to more performant runtimes and architectures in response to operational concerns at scale, which have a tenuous link to language The runtime performance and the language are deeply linked. None of the dynamically…
Hi Nikita. Can you share any of Neon's techniques for minimizing noisy neighbor issues in the multi tenant storage services? Thanks!