Not sure about that.
Aren't some people paid to do contributions? As in, it is their livelihoods? Of Rust developers, like you, there are also some that get paid to contribute to Rust open source projects, for instance regarding the…
But "learning a new language" can mean multiple different things. It can mean learning a language at a superficial level, but it can also mean learning the depths of the language, or the depths of the ecosystem, or…
> I think it would be interesting to see to what extent the Rust 2024 changes alleviated the problem since it only changed if let, but I haven't found that information (yet). The second link from Reddit,…
Indeed it is, read this: https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1v54et2/what_are_the_... https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1v54et2/what_are_the_... It is a mess, temporary lifetime extension is a mess in both Rust,…
> Yup it's not without cost. But paying the cost short-term can yield benefits for the long-term. That was not really the vibe I got from your (Insanity) other comment regarding your mental model that you mentioned.…
> that should be > than in your comment. Aside that, I did not make any arguments either way regarding your question. But, I am not sure that your question makes sense in this context, for the developers that are…
Your argument about stagnation is good, but "capable engineers can pick up any language" is not without costs for the involved developers in terms of time spent learning paradigms, features, bugs, gotchas (like…
Even without any LLM usage after the rewrite, there might be a change in license as seen with similar projects, which supports your argument. From the article: > The company points to projects such as uutils coreutils…
Not sure about that.
Aren't some people paid to do contributions? As in, it is their livelihoods? Of Rust developers, like you, there are also some that get paid to contribute to Rust open source projects, for instance regarding the…
But "learning a new language" can mean multiple different things. It can mean learning a language at a superficial level, but it can also mean learning the depths of the language, or the depths of the ecosystem, or…
> I think it would be interesting to see to what extent the Rust 2024 changes alleviated the problem since it only changed if let, but I haven't found that information (yet). The second link from Reddit,…
Indeed it is, read this: https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1v54et2/what_are_the_... https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1v54et2/what_are_the_... It is a mess, temporary lifetime extension is a mess in both Rust,…
> Yup it's not without cost. But paying the cost short-term can yield benefits for the long-term. That was not really the vibe I got from your (Insanity) other comment regarding your mental model that you mentioned.…
> that should be > than in your comment. Aside that, I did not make any arguments either way regarding your question. But, I am not sure that your question makes sense in this context, for the developers that are…
Your argument about stagnation is good, but "capable engineers can pick up any language" is not without costs for the involved developers in terms of time spent learning paradigms, features, bugs, gotchas (like…
Even without any LLM usage after the rewrite, there might be a change in license as seen with similar projects, which supports your argument. From the article: > The company points to projects such as uutils coreutils…