> you have this idea that PI's hate their work / are gaming the system. That’s actually not what I said. > If the PI chooses use some funds from a grant to carry out speculative research. Good. GOOD. That is what…
No it’s really not that nuanced. Society should ban things that are obvious traps and cause massive costs to society. Banning gambling doesn’t mean hunting down gamblers, it means stopping them from being in the App…
> Perhaps ban advertising Yes. Ban the phone apps and had the ads. Advertising works people, that’s why they pay for it!
That makes sense. I guess seeing the full lifecycle is always how I think about software I work on. I can do a better job of communicating that’s what I’m doing and why the approach I’m using (of doing less) actually…
> spotting what comes next and knowing how to solve it faster This is such a strange mindset to me. Part of staff engineer is learning you don't need to solve tomorrow's problems. You solve it with the constraints you…
> convincing others to fund it is harder. Yes, we are in agreement. That's why promoters are so valuable. > in the same way a PI doesn't spend their days doing lab work. This large workforce of Phd's protecting the time…
> Please. PLEASE. I am begging you. Learn about a subject before forming an opinion about it. I actually lived it, so thanks for your understanding and consideration. > Getting money to fund an idea is not lesser than,…
It’s scary that: 1. Our top researchers are wasting their time and energy promoting projects for grants. 2. Any attempt by the public to oversee or guide these grants is thwarted by smart people. 3. If you try to learn…
I agree, we should use policy to prevent bad outcomes.
Professors have told me it doesn’t matter which administration is in - they just need to rebrand their project to meet funding requirements. Isn’t that a scary thought? We have no visibility and they are skilled enough…
Of course the intent is not malicious. As a student you want someone who speaks your language and someone who understands you. And similarly for professors. The absurdity is Americans assuming people won’t express…
Even the undergrad is like this. I was shocked to learn it wasn’t a historical study of economic theory and instead a technical course in stats and modeling.
This. It’s not useful to capture the smartest people if we deploy them to spend 50% of their time promoting projects for grants.
> the majority of all economists are Republican Of mainstream politicians they are most aligned with Obama or Clinton. The Trump movement since 2016 has taken republicans away from mainstream Economics.
I think you may be imagining a disruptive person who can’t work with others, and then associating it with a political position.
Framing DEI skepticism as an inability to work with minority or protected groups makes me think you don’t understand the position well.
> Executives are almost solely focused on financial rewards. This is not true at all. Far more important in upper management is ego - they will lose money to improve their legacy or beat a competitor. > If you have…
CEOs are also employees. This is a weird thing where you have invented enemies in your head you’ve never talked to. Yeah capitalism is sad in a lot of ways - particular the modes of possible value. But we are actually…
No. opposition is not the right model It’s just business. You have something they want, they have something you want. Try to take advantage of places where your incentives aligned and watch out when they are not.
Yes. It’s not the way you detect cats in a photo. But detecting patterns in images is a very common problem.
This is absolutely true. And the mistake I see from PhDs who want to switch into industry, is looking for work around the exact subject they did their research on. Rather they need to identify a useful industry area and…
I think it’s going to be even worse - companies are going to go to ChatGPT with lawyers and say you are making false/unfair claims about our product. We should be able to give it this copy with correct information to…
And what that means is the usefulness of LLms in recommending products is about to jump off a cliff.
Ok. I think this is becoming a pretty strained argument. Leftists don’t generally like mainstream economics and subscribe to more niche segments. That’s ok - and there is a lot to criticize. But it’s also wrong that…
I wonder if his prominent online persona made him more likely to be targeted. People at the SEC are very likely to be in the age range who is familiar with him. Not to suggest he is or is not guilty but that being loud…
> you have this idea that PI's hate their work / are gaming the system. That’s actually not what I said. > If the PI chooses use some funds from a grant to carry out speculative research. Good. GOOD. That is what…
No it’s really not that nuanced. Society should ban things that are obvious traps and cause massive costs to society. Banning gambling doesn’t mean hunting down gamblers, it means stopping them from being in the App…
> Perhaps ban advertising Yes. Ban the phone apps and had the ads. Advertising works people, that’s why they pay for it!
That makes sense. I guess seeing the full lifecycle is always how I think about software I work on. I can do a better job of communicating that’s what I’m doing and why the approach I’m using (of doing less) actually…
> spotting what comes next and knowing how to solve it faster This is such a strange mindset to me. Part of staff engineer is learning you don't need to solve tomorrow's problems. You solve it with the constraints you…
> convincing others to fund it is harder. Yes, we are in agreement. That's why promoters are so valuable. > in the same way a PI doesn't spend their days doing lab work. This large workforce of Phd's protecting the time…
> Please. PLEASE. I am begging you. Learn about a subject before forming an opinion about it. I actually lived it, so thanks for your understanding and consideration. > Getting money to fund an idea is not lesser than,…
It’s scary that: 1. Our top researchers are wasting their time and energy promoting projects for grants. 2. Any attempt by the public to oversee or guide these grants is thwarted by smart people. 3. If you try to learn…
I agree, we should use policy to prevent bad outcomes.
Professors have told me it doesn’t matter which administration is in - they just need to rebrand their project to meet funding requirements. Isn’t that a scary thought? We have no visibility and they are skilled enough…
Of course the intent is not malicious. As a student you want someone who speaks your language and someone who understands you. And similarly for professors. The absurdity is Americans assuming people won’t express…
Even the undergrad is like this. I was shocked to learn it wasn’t a historical study of economic theory and instead a technical course in stats and modeling.
This. It’s not useful to capture the smartest people if we deploy them to spend 50% of their time promoting projects for grants.
> the majority of all economists are Republican Of mainstream politicians they are most aligned with Obama or Clinton. The Trump movement since 2016 has taken republicans away from mainstream Economics.
I think you may be imagining a disruptive person who can’t work with others, and then associating it with a political position.
Framing DEI skepticism as an inability to work with minority or protected groups makes me think you don’t understand the position well.
> Executives are almost solely focused on financial rewards. This is not true at all. Far more important in upper management is ego - they will lose money to improve their legacy or beat a competitor. > If you have…
CEOs are also employees. This is a weird thing where you have invented enemies in your head you’ve never talked to. Yeah capitalism is sad in a lot of ways - particular the modes of possible value. But we are actually…
No. opposition is not the right model It’s just business. You have something they want, they have something you want. Try to take advantage of places where your incentives aligned and watch out when they are not.
Yes. It’s not the way you detect cats in a photo. But detecting patterns in images is a very common problem.
This is absolutely true. And the mistake I see from PhDs who want to switch into industry, is looking for work around the exact subject they did their research on. Rather they need to identify a useful industry area and…
I think it’s going to be even worse - companies are going to go to ChatGPT with lawyers and say you are making false/unfair claims about our product. We should be able to give it this copy with correct information to…
And what that means is the usefulness of LLms in recommending products is about to jump off a cliff.
Ok. I think this is becoming a pretty strained argument. Leftists don’t generally like mainstream economics and subscribe to more niche segments. That’s ok - and there is a lot to criticize. But it’s also wrong that…
I wonder if his prominent online persona made him more likely to be targeted. People at the SEC are very likely to be in the age range who is familiar with him. Not to suggest he is or is not guilty but that being loud…