For this reason, I think of objects as not equivalent to closures, but rather ML-style functors. I think implementing objects as records with closures as fields is really just a poor man's parameterized module.
It's a view generation library, not a DOM-diffing library. That's like asking how to rotate a subtree in an RB tree library.
Is this guy really a former Google employee? Those posts sound like they were written by an elementary school kid.
Looking forward to this. Registration doesn't seem to work yet. Please add 'monospace' to the font-family declaration. The site looks terrible in Ubuntu.
For this reason, I think of objects as not equivalent to closures, but rather ML-style functors. I think implementing objects as records with closures as fields is really just a poor man's parameterized module.
It's a view generation library, not a DOM-diffing library. That's like asking how to rotate a subtree in an RB tree library.
Is this guy really a former Google employee? Those posts sound like they were written by an elementary school kid.
Looking forward to this. Registration doesn't seem to work yet. Please add 'monospace' to the font-family declaration. The site looks terrible in Ubuntu.