There's a "Curb Your Enthusiasm" episode where Larry David's character donates to a museum with his name on the donation. There's no self deception for him; he wants to do something good AND he wants the credit. And…
No, it's not relevant. There's no considering being done, the feature is being shipped. Please stop with the Rust spam.
That's unfortunate. Try a different dermatologist? I've gone to flatiron dermatology in the past, and they're solid.
Alright, I'll bite. Why do you think not breaking users programs is abandoning quality?
I very well could be wrong, but that's almost completely besides the real point [as well the self diagnosis regarding ADHD]. The amount of anxiety you're experiencing in your day to day life is grossly abnormal. I would…
> The lexer shouldn't have to deal with that sort of stuff. The problem with that is that the entire python ecosystem had to deal with that instead... I'm going way past rant territory at this point, but there's a…
So what? In the history of Python, there was literally 0 bugs caused by print being a statement. Breaking backwards compatibility for shit like that is amateur hour. edit: And just to be clear, I'm fine with making…
It sounds like you're experiencing panic attacks.
Writing some optional, non-essential piece != rewriting a piece that will require taking rust as a dependency for the rest of time. The kernel folks just did a lot of work to remove the strict dependency on GCC. To…
Right, which is why it's a poor choice for the kernel at this time.
For the Linux kernel? Absolutely. Rust is way too unstable right now for such an important piece of software. Give it 20 years and a standard, then we can talk.
I wouldn't be too worried about it. The kernel people aren't going to take a dependency on something that isn't standardized and doesn't have a spec.
> not putting your engineering due diligence into delivering a product to the customer. Yes. This is exactly what this person should do. Stop worrying about arbitrary rules and just deliver the damn product already. A…
Sure. My point wasn't really whether to write unit tests or not. It's more, do what works for you / your team to enable you to ship consistently. For the OP, spending all of their time writing tests clearly isn't…
I don't understand your point. We're specifically talking about a one person company.
I'm no fan of Amazon, but it's the third most valuable company on the planet. Whatever they're doing is obviously working for them, even if I personally wouldn't want to work there.
It's never required: https://stedolan.github.io/jq/manual/#Streaming
You think everyone building tools like k8s, terraform, etc. are fools? That's a pretty myopic worldview.
Sure, and if the moon was made of cheese, it would still be a sphere lighting up the night sky. The fact that the go designers prioritize things like statically compiled binaries is the whole magic of Go in the first…
You can use `go generate` with the AST package and get the same thing.
Enlightenment isn't a thing that can be accomplished. That's an oxymoron.
> You’ll of course be spending years and years practicing programming You can't just 'of course' this! I mean, you can, but that's the whole point. If you, or anyone reading this enough cares enough about being a great…
>it is that ego sabotages your efforts to put in the time Sure, but what I'm saying that that statement is almost meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Is not letting your ego get in the way a necessary part of…
"This is ego distraction. It’s about putting off uncertainty till later to buy temporary relief. To protect our ego from a perceived threat. Things like hard problems, the possibility of failing publicly, or negative…
Totally agree with you. I think the industry is going through an "emperor has no clothes" thing with unit tests and dependency inversion at the moment. The creator of BDD gave this talk a few years ago, which resonated…
There's a "Curb Your Enthusiasm" episode where Larry David's character donates to a museum with his name on the donation. There's no self deception for him; he wants to do something good AND he wants the credit. And…
No, it's not relevant. There's no considering being done, the feature is being shipped. Please stop with the Rust spam.
That's unfortunate. Try a different dermatologist? I've gone to flatiron dermatology in the past, and they're solid.
Alright, I'll bite. Why do you think not breaking users programs is abandoning quality?
I very well could be wrong, but that's almost completely besides the real point [as well the self diagnosis regarding ADHD]. The amount of anxiety you're experiencing in your day to day life is grossly abnormal. I would…
> The lexer shouldn't have to deal with that sort of stuff. The problem with that is that the entire python ecosystem had to deal with that instead... I'm going way past rant territory at this point, but there's a…
So what? In the history of Python, there was literally 0 bugs caused by print being a statement. Breaking backwards compatibility for shit like that is amateur hour. edit: And just to be clear, I'm fine with making…
It sounds like you're experiencing panic attacks.
Writing some optional, non-essential piece != rewriting a piece that will require taking rust as a dependency for the rest of time. The kernel folks just did a lot of work to remove the strict dependency on GCC. To…
Right, which is why it's a poor choice for the kernel at this time.
For the Linux kernel? Absolutely. Rust is way too unstable right now for such an important piece of software. Give it 20 years and a standard, then we can talk.
I wouldn't be too worried about it. The kernel people aren't going to take a dependency on something that isn't standardized and doesn't have a spec.
> not putting your engineering due diligence into delivering a product to the customer. Yes. This is exactly what this person should do. Stop worrying about arbitrary rules and just deliver the damn product already. A…
Sure. My point wasn't really whether to write unit tests or not. It's more, do what works for you / your team to enable you to ship consistently. For the OP, spending all of their time writing tests clearly isn't…
I don't understand your point. We're specifically talking about a one person company.
I'm no fan of Amazon, but it's the third most valuable company on the planet. Whatever they're doing is obviously working for them, even if I personally wouldn't want to work there.
It's never required: https://stedolan.github.io/jq/manual/#Streaming
You think everyone building tools like k8s, terraform, etc. are fools? That's a pretty myopic worldview.
Sure, and if the moon was made of cheese, it would still be a sphere lighting up the night sky. The fact that the go designers prioritize things like statically compiled binaries is the whole magic of Go in the first…
You can use `go generate` with the AST package and get the same thing.
Enlightenment isn't a thing that can be accomplished. That's an oxymoron.
> You’ll of course be spending years and years practicing programming You can't just 'of course' this! I mean, you can, but that's the whole point. If you, or anyone reading this enough cares enough about being a great…
>it is that ego sabotages your efforts to put in the time Sure, but what I'm saying that that statement is almost meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Is not letting your ego get in the way a necessary part of…
"This is ego distraction. It’s about putting off uncertainty till later to buy temporary relief. To protect our ego from a perceived threat. Things like hard problems, the possibility of failing publicly, or negative…
Totally agree with you. I think the industry is going through an "emperor has no clothes" thing with unit tests and dependency inversion at the moment. The creator of BDD gave this talk a few years ago, which resonated…