Exactly, and that has nothing at all to do with the position posted by Microsoft in terms of this thread.
Where did I write that anything was wrong with it? I was referring to the original comment, which speculates wildly based on nothing and its mother.
Doubtful. These are entirely different parts of the toolchain, and the goals (while similar in wording) are entirely different from each other.
Nothing about this comment, short of your preference of C# over languages (and non-languages) you don't have any experience with, makes any sense at all. It's wild speculation based on a StackExchange question…
> C# is probably my favorite language, although to be honest I don't have much experience with Ruby, Python, or Coffeescript. http://i.imgur.com/iWBOL.gif
Exactly, and that has nothing at all to do with the position posted by Microsoft in terms of this thread.
Where did I write that anything was wrong with it? I was referring to the original comment, which speculates wildly based on nothing and its mother.
Doubtful. These are entirely different parts of the toolchain, and the goals (while similar in wording) are entirely different from each other.
Nothing about this comment, short of your preference of C# over languages (and non-languages) you don't have any experience with, makes any sense at all. It's wild speculation based on a StackExchange question…
> C# is probably my favorite language, although to be honest I don't have much experience with Ruby, Python, or Coffeescript. http://i.imgur.com/iWBOL.gif