This follows from the assumption "If wild animals’ well-being is indeed below the threshold for a life worth living", which is argued in the passage: > One reason to suspect that on average this pleasure is outweighed…
The funniest thing about this is that he got confused between Peter Singer, the ethicist, and Paul Singer, a venture capitalist and philanthropist. It gets even funnier when you find out that Paul Singer's philanthropic…
This follows from the assumption "If wild animals’ well-being is indeed below the threshold for a life worth living", which is argued in the passage: > One reason to suspect that on average this pleasure is outweighed…
The funniest thing about this is that he got confused between Peter Singer, the ethicist, and Paul Singer, a venture capitalist and philanthropist. It gets even funnier when you find out that Paul Singer's philanthropic…