Pathetic lack of self-respect.
The Samsung foldables are an entirely different size and aspect ratio; how is the Duo a copy of something entirely different?
How can you make a computer or smartphone that's distinct from the competition? These are commodity appliances built to a price point with some graphic design slapped on top to pretty it up.
Based on the marketing materials, the Duo is different from other folds because: - Runs iOS with lots(?) of attention to UI - Won't break from a piece of dust - IP68 rated - Will actually receive software updates unlike…
Correct, it's not that. It's worse.
If I wasn't talking to you and you were just listening to me in public, yes.
> It is absolutely impressive; these types of models are going to change the world in one form or another. > But at least for the moment I don’t know how to work with it for actual software engineering. These two…
Apple isn't really an innovator, at least in the sense of delivering "new" things. Their success is in assessing a market and refining products for consumer adoption. Mac wasn't the first personal computer but it was…
The linked page is entirely incomprehensible.
Do you honestly think roads and the internet are similar? I don't think you've really thought that through.
Yeah, looking around at society today it's obvious the main problem is the government trying too hard and passing too much legislation.
> Why do everyone assume they are subsidized? It's not an assumption when the companies hosting the models publicly announce that they're subsidizing costs.
Worthington's Law strikes again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vudnMLzZjTg
I'm glad you are recognizing that different things are different.
People with power do what they want, and regular people don't like it. Glad you saw the error of your ways.
You're looking at people upset about Lake Ontario being renamed and saying "people don't get upset about things being renamed." Different things are different.
How about "don't openly support a fascist regime by giving it money and attending the inauguration"?
Yep. They're open and obvious about it.
Pretty weak troll, but there are a lot of good reasons that society agrees to call things by common names.
Which previous administration renamed everything under the sun?
> Nothing I know about Google informs me that anyone there is thrilled about the change either Oh, at least a few people are thrilled: https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/420aa69/214...
Google is raking in money from the Trump administration. Sundar and the other execs are all in, they love the guy.
Great piece. Seeing that depth and context is one of the best parts of gaining intellectual maturity.
Anecdotally, in the tech industry you usually will need to change companies to move up. Certainly not true everywhere, but it's been a "feature" of the industry for a decade or more.
I think the headline accurately describes the content of the article. The actual op ed is linked.
Pathetic lack of self-respect.
The Samsung foldables are an entirely different size and aspect ratio; how is the Duo a copy of something entirely different?
How can you make a computer or smartphone that's distinct from the competition? These are commodity appliances built to a price point with some graphic design slapped on top to pretty it up.
Based on the marketing materials, the Duo is different from other folds because: - Runs iOS with lots(?) of attention to UI - Won't break from a piece of dust - IP68 rated - Will actually receive software updates unlike…
Correct, it's not that. It's worse.
If I wasn't talking to you and you were just listening to me in public, yes.
> It is absolutely impressive; these types of models are going to change the world in one form or another. > But at least for the moment I don’t know how to work with it for actual software engineering. These two…
Apple isn't really an innovator, at least in the sense of delivering "new" things. Their success is in assessing a market and refining products for consumer adoption. Mac wasn't the first personal computer but it was…
The linked page is entirely incomprehensible.
Do you honestly think roads and the internet are similar? I don't think you've really thought that through.
Yeah, looking around at society today it's obvious the main problem is the government trying too hard and passing too much legislation.
> Why do everyone assume they are subsidized? It's not an assumption when the companies hosting the models publicly announce that they're subsidizing costs.
Worthington's Law strikes again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vudnMLzZjTg
I'm glad you are recognizing that different things are different.
People with power do what they want, and regular people don't like it. Glad you saw the error of your ways.
You're looking at people upset about Lake Ontario being renamed and saying "people don't get upset about things being renamed." Different things are different.
How about "don't openly support a fascist regime by giving it money and attending the inauguration"?
Yep. They're open and obvious about it.
Pretty weak troll, but there are a lot of good reasons that society agrees to call things by common names.
Which previous administration renamed everything under the sun?
> Nothing I know about Google informs me that anyone there is thrilled about the change either Oh, at least a few people are thrilled: https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/420aa69/214...
Google is raking in money from the Trump administration. Sundar and the other execs are all in, they love the guy.
Great piece. Seeing that depth and context is one of the best parts of gaining intellectual maturity.
Anecdotally, in the tech industry you usually will need to change companies to move up. Certainly not true everywhere, but it's been a "feature" of the industry for a decade or more.
I think the headline accurately describes the content of the article. The actual op ed is linked.