and the corollary is of course that saying something doesn't make it true
[flagged]
I'm not sure many people will believe you saying that
> "Sovereign head of state" tortured, "disappeared", and murdered thousands, and rigged elections. can't wait for someone to kidnap trump as well
because that's not their job?
everybody is emotionally motivated, you included
nobody's trying to force you to socialize, it's just advice. take it or leave it
sure but my point is people could agree they were faster at least. that is decidedly not true for LLMs. maybe due to alignable vs non-alignable differences
sounds like snake oil to me :)
I wonder why the volume of spam has come up 100x. seems like maybe Ads are the only way to make Sense of it
and those stories were in the short run correct, since Amazon and Uber succeeded by massively undercutting existing businesses. reel customers in with charity, then turn the screws. what business is ChatGPT undercutting?
yes, it is trivially true that each new person who recommends LLMs is a new person coming into the fold
who would I be trying to trick if it was? you didn't answer the question anyways. I'm not wondering whether cars were seen as strictly better than horses in all situations. I'm wondering if people disagreed so…
yeah I agree about the negative externalities but I'm curious about the perceived benefits. did anybody argue that cars were actually slower than horse and carriage? (were they at first?)
[dead]
have you tried using $NEWEST_MODEL ?
get ready to tick those numbers over to 2026!
> The variance is great this strikes me as a very important thing to reflect on. when the automobile was invented, was the apparent benefit so incredibly variable?
agreed. we should instead be sneering at the AI critics because "you're holding it wrong"
you are saying X, but a completely different group of people didn't say Y that other time! I got you!!!!
do you get scared when you hear other ghost stories too?
> But the claim for LLMs are next token predictors is the SAME mischaracterization. LLMs are clearly more than next token predictors. Don’t get me wrong LLMs aren’t human… but they are clearly more than just a next…
and the corollary is of course that saying something doesn't make it true
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
I'm not sure many people will believe you saying that
> "Sovereign head of state" tortured, "disappeared", and murdered thousands, and rigged elections. can't wait for someone to kidnap trump as well
because that's not their job?
everybody is emotionally motivated, you included
nobody's trying to force you to socialize, it's just advice. take it or leave it
sure but my point is people could agree they were faster at least. that is decidedly not true for LLMs. maybe due to alignable vs non-alignable differences
sounds like snake oil to me :)
I wonder why the volume of spam has come up 100x. seems like maybe Ads are the only way to make Sense of it
and those stories were in the short run correct, since Amazon and Uber succeeded by massively undercutting existing businesses. reel customers in with charity, then turn the screws. what business is ChatGPT undercutting?
yes, it is trivially true that each new person who recommends LLMs is a new person coming into the fold
who would I be trying to trick if it was? you didn't answer the question anyways. I'm not wondering whether cars were seen as strictly better than horses in all situations. I'm wondering if people disagreed so…
yeah I agree about the negative externalities but I'm curious about the perceived benefits. did anybody argue that cars were actually slower than horse and carriage? (were they at first?)
[dead]
[dead]
have you tried using $NEWEST_MODEL ?
get ready to tick those numbers over to 2026!
> The variance is great this strikes me as a very important thing to reflect on. when the automobile was invented, was the apparent benefit so incredibly variable?
agreed. we should instead be sneering at the AI critics because "you're holding it wrong"
you are saying X, but a completely different group of people didn't say Y that other time! I got you!!!!
do you get scared when you hear other ghost stories too?
> But the claim for LLMs are next token predictors is the SAME mischaracterization. LLMs are clearly more than next token predictors. Don’t get me wrong LLMs aren’t human… but they are clearly more than just a next…