10000000 Mind boggling
Hard disagree. The information system and its popup was vital information that the attending failed to act on. This anecdote serves as an example of user error and incompetence. And I’m a huge hater of popups.
cut a PR to improve it; that would be nice
That looks to be someone presenting their opinion—not a statement of fact. Ironically, too, considering the guidelines they link guides users to not do what they're doing.
> Does anyone use Fossil? Daily, across a half dozen odd repos, and it greatly simplified my life since switching from Git. My primary wish is to have the forum compatible with email. And the next would be a partial…
In the event it's done before pushing, it's still lying, albeit to yourself—it is falsifying the record of what actually happened. The clearest way of conveying this is with the word "lying." Perhaps "falsifying" or…
Not a replacement inasmuch as it's not a standalone chat client to be used by disparate users for various reasons. It's a chat client for developers of a given project to convene discussion about work going on in that…
Except none of that refutes the fact that changing history is lying irrespective of the motivation behind the change. You can rephrase it however your sensibilities like, it won’t change that fact.
You could always try "fossil amend" as a commit amendment tool for starters.
10000000 Mind boggling
Hard disagree. The information system and its popup was vital information that the attending failed to act on. This anecdote serves as an example of user error and incompetence. And I’m a huge hater of popups.
cut a PR to improve it; that would be nice
That looks to be someone presenting their opinion—not a statement of fact. Ironically, too, considering the guidelines they link guides users to not do what they're doing.
> Does anyone use Fossil? Daily, across a half dozen odd repos, and it greatly simplified my life since switching from Git. My primary wish is to have the forum compatible with email. And the next would be a partial…
In the event it's done before pushing, it's still lying, albeit to yourself—it is falsifying the record of what actually happened. The clearest way of conveying this is with the word "lying." Perhaps "falsifying" or…
Not a replacement inasmuch as it's not a standalone chat client to be used by disparate users for various reasons. It's a chat client for developers of a given project to convene discussion about work going on in that…
Except none of that refutes the fact that changing history is lying irrespective of the motivation behind the change. You can rephrase it however your sensibilities like, it won’t change that fact.
You could always try "fossil amend" as a commit amendment tool for starters.