> However, the "asset" associated with software development seems pretty uniquely hard to transfer Isn't it what's happening when a company gets acquired? Buyer pays for a software and a team (more for the latter…
3. Agree, but this applies to assets depreciation too, how software is different? I understand the rest and I'm not saying it's a good law. It's just not as bad as in the example with $1,000,000 above as IMO most…
How you raise money doesn't make a difference. What matters is how fast you can utilize your "engineering assets". More often than not startups don't sell anything (let's say "anything" is > 20% of developers' cost) in…
Create A+B integration branch, then merge in both directions, A -> A+B then A+B -> A (to pick up changes from B). Integration branch can be tested and merged to master later instead of individual branches A and B. It's…
> However, the "asset" associated with software development seems pretty uniquely hard to transfer Isn't it what's happening when a company gets acquired? Buyer pays for a software and a team (more for the latter…
3. Agree, but this applies to assets depreciation too, how software is different? I understand the rest and I'm not saying it's a good law. It's just not as bad as in the example with $1,000,000 above as IMO most…
How you raise money doesn't make a difference. What matters is how fast you can utilize your "engineering assets". More often than not startups don't sell anything (let's say "anything" is > 20% of developers' cost) in…
Create A+B integration branch, then merge in both directions, A -> A+B then A+B -> A (to pick up changes from B). Integration branch can be tested and merged to master later instead of individual branches A and B. It's…