Problem with Hare is that it is (or at least was last time I checked) Linux/Unix only and so by design. That kinda makes it DOA for many.
I think it is way simpler than that. IMHO, for many people young or old the value proposition of emacs simple is no longer there and/or worth the huge learning curve. For most things people would use something like…
To some vscode probably is good enough and that is OK. I don't see why this would be an issue.
To be fair the importance for devs/programmers to touch type is often very exaggerated. Not saying it is not a benefit but is is far from a "must" or something that is a detriment to producing quality work. In the days…
I don't think neovim is as strong as emacs when it comes to extensibility. It also has no self documenting like emacs. If one is committed to the philosophy of using emacs for everything or almost everything neovim…
To be fair some of these are subjective. People of course should never sell their opinions as objective or facts. Which btw, I don't think the person you responded to did.
"compared to "more accessible" languages and all their hidden gotchas" ---- Yes because APL or array languages in general have absolutely no hidden gotchas ...
Kotlin is weird inclusion in that list with Java and .NET unless you'd include Android.
I like OpenBSD, but its very limited virtualization options means I cannot really use it full-time. Also the performance is not that great, but something I could live with.
As Schemes go Chicken is one of the most practical ones and easiest or straightforward to get into, IMHO! Would love to see it grow more widely adaptation.
It is being actively maintained. More important, IMHO, would be if they ( I think it is Chris Hanson these days) would greatly improve some of the documentation. For quite a few things you need to read source code.…
Regarding employability. Isn't OCaml more prevalent in Europe? France obviously for one but England, too? Also I would assume with knowing OCaml one would also be fairly comfortable with F#, which also should bring some…
I like this video. IMHO it is a good example of REPL driven development. Nothing to do with typing things into the REPL. https://youtu.be/C-kF25fWTO8?t=1039
That is my understanding of REPL driven development, too.
My problem with KDE has essentially been the same now for years. To me, it feels too fragile.
Problem with Hare is that it is (or at least was last time I checked) Linux/Unix only and so by design. That kinda makes it DOA for many.
I think it is way simpler than that. IMHO, for many people young or old the value proposition of emacs simple is no longer there and/or worth the huge learning curve. For most things people would use something like…
To some vscode probably is good enough and that is OK. I don't see why this would be an issue.
To be fair the importance for devs/programmers to touch type is often very exaggerated. Not saying it is not a benefit but is is far from a "must" or something that is a detriment to producing quality work. In the days…
I don't think neovim is as strong as emacs when it comes to extensibility. It also has no self documenting like emacs. If one is committed to the philosophy of using emacs for everything or almost everything neovim…
To be fair some of these are subjective. People of course should never sell their opinions as objective or facts. Which btw, I don't think the person you responded to did.
"compared to "more accessible" languages and all their hidden gotchas" ---- Yes because APL or array languages in general have absolutely no hidden gotchas ...
Kotlin is weird inclusion in that list with Java and .NET unless you'd include Android.
I like OpenBSD, but its very limited virtualization options means I cannot really use it full-time. Also the performance is not that great, but something I could live with.
As Schemes go Chicken is one of the most practical ones and easiest or straightforward to get into, IMHO! Would love to see it grow more widely adaptation.
It is being actively maintained. More important, IMHO, would be if they ( I think it is Chris Hanson these days) would greatly improve some of the documentation. For quite a few things you need to read source code.…
Regarding employability. Isn't OCaml more prevalent in Europe? France obviously for one but England, too? Also I would assume with knowing OCaml one would also be fairly comfortable with F#, which also should bring some…
I like this video. IMHO it is a good example of REPL driven development. Nothing to do with typing things into the REPL. https://youtu.be/C-kF25fWTO8?t=1039
That is my understanding of REPL driven development, too.
My problem with KDE has essentially been the same now for years. To me, it feels too fragile.