> If progress is as fast as LLMs Is this the new "x technology is a year away" ?
Could you provide examples of healthcare executives held personally liable for harm resulting from reckless decision-making? I have never heard of such a thing happening in healthcare so framing CEO responsibility as a…
Pharmaceuticals are heavily regulated, the "we vibecoded a therapeutic and released it without testing" hypothetical has no basis in reality
Would Doom give a sociopath instructions on how to commit a mass shooting if asked? I don't remember that part of the game
Only through the first two paragraphs but a little turned off by the "everybody else is wrong, we are right and it's this one specific thing" attitude when it the topic is understanding something as complex and opaque…
The cheminformatics I do (mostly drug discovery/biophysics) definitely requires bonds!
I'd be really interested to know of anybody making money with those topics (and doesn't already have their own domain-specific practice for the problem)
This code is jibberish to me, but it appears the target is just parsing how many atoms are in a molecule string of some representation. That's cool, but to do just about anything useful in chemistry we need the bond…
Much like the classic "our department in [big company] works a lot like a startup"
I'm a little surprised to see you dismiss type-checkers disagreeing with each other - there are more than a few cases of mypy and pyright disagreeing and brushing them aside as rare enough to be irrelevant is in…
> as for the split in type checking tools, it is not as bad as you think I'm surprised you already know it's not as bad as I think - have you been able to use it? Working on a team that mixes mypy and pyright is pretty…
Unfortunately that doesn't answer the question
thanks, I didn't know it was a thread because of the login wall
kinda mixed on this - why not just contribute to the community tool? - there's already a major split in Python type-checking tools, if there's a third that doesn't agree with either of them it'll be a mess for projects…
Hopefully so, but there will probably always be a back-and-forth between frauds and journalists in the same way security is always a competition. At least the easy frauds are more likely to be caught today.
Harboring skepticism of the work people did with a seemingly fraudulent researcher is a good idea. Dismissing everybody in a field whether or not their work is fraudulent is disrespectful approach (not to mention…
I'm not asking for people to turn off skepticism or blindly trust researchers. It's not disrespectful to be skeptical. What is disrespectful is not bothering to read what people have to say before dismissing them as…
> ... corporate american enabling this will not be seen positively. I don't think this is true in red states or for the minority views that determine what is and is not illegal in this country, or at least it won't play…
It's just diffusing the problem from urban centers to mid-sized cities elsewhere in the united states. Say for simplicity that the core result of the problem is that people not making astronomical tech/finance/etc.…
> everyone wanted to play like a Karpov or a Kasparov. I wonder if there's a modern analog to this with how super GM styles have mostly converged. Trying to play like Magnus is as silly as trying to play like an engine.…
Thanks for the context - I haven't spent a ton of time looking around but it does seem like there are several moving parts (and evidently some important stuff isn't in the same github org)
What time controls do you play? Cheating is much more prevalent in rapid than blitz, with correspondence probably being the worst of all. It's unlucky for people who don't like speed chess. The only solution to this…
I was also surprised to learn (years ago) BuzzFeed has a decently-sized investigative team
There's also an issue of community/people you'd work with. (Fair or not) there's a strong perception that the current COBOL devs are people that are close to retirement and not exactly eager to take a junior dev under…
I'm with you, but I wonder if this is the sort of "only people on this site care and the vast majority of the readership wouldn't use it" thing ... I'm not sure it is, but it could be, and I wonder if somebody with…
> If progress is as fast as LLMs Is this the new "x technology is a year away" ?
Could you provide examples of healthcare executives held personally liable for harm resulting from reckless decision-making? I have never heard of such a thing happening in healthcare so framing CEO responsibility as a…
Pharmaceuticals are heavily regulated, the "we vibecoded a therapeutic and released it without testing" hypothetical has no basis in reality
Would Doom give a sociopath instructions on how to commit a mass shooting if asked? I don't remember that part of the game
Only through the first two paragraphs but a little turned off by the "everybody else is wrong, we are right and it's this one specific thing" attitude when it the topic is understanding something as complex and opaque…
The cheminformatics I do (mostly drug discovery/biophysics) definitely requires bonds!
I'd be really interested to know of anybody making money with those topics (and doesn't already have their own domain-specific practice for the problem)
This code is jibberish to me, but it appears the target is just parsing how many atoms are in a molecule string of some representation. That's cool, but to do just about anything useful in chemistry we need the bond…
Much like the classic "our department in [big company] works a lot like a startup"
I'm a little surprised to see you dismiss type-checkers disagreeing with each other - there are more than a few cases of mypy and pyright disagreeing and brushing them aside as rare enough to be irrelevant is in…
> as for the split in type checking tools, it is not as bad as you think I'm surprised you already know it's not as bad as I think - have you been able to use it? Working on a team that mixes mypy and pyright is pretty…
Unfortunately that doesn't answer the question
thanks, I didn't know it was a thread because of the login wall
kinda mixed on this - why not just contribute to the community tool? - there's already a major split in Python type-checking tools, if there's a third that doesn't agree with either of them it'll be a mess for projects…
Hopefully so, but there will probably always be a back-and-forth between frauds and journalists in the same way security is always a competition. At least the easy frauds are more likely to be caught today.
Harboring skepticism of the work people did with a seemingly fraudulent researcher is a good idea. Dismissing everybody in a field whether or not their work is fraudulent is disrespectful approach (not to mention…
I'm not asking for people to turn off skepticism or blindly trust researchers. It's not disrespectful to be skeptical. What is disrespectful is not bothering to read what people have to say before dismissing them as…
> ... corporate american enabling this will not be seen positively. I don't think this is true in red states or for the minority views that determine what is and is not illegal in this country, or at least it won't play…
It's just diffusing the problem from urban centers to mid-sized cities elsewhere in the united states. Say for simplicity that the core result of the problem is that people not making astronomical tech/finance/etc.…
> everyone wanted to play like a Karpov or a Kasparov. I wonder if there's a modern analog to this with how super GM styles have mostly converged. Trying to play like Magnus is as silly as trying to play like an engine.…
Thanks for the context - I haven't spent a ton of time looking around but it does seem like there are several moving parts (and evidently some important stuff isn't in the same github org)
What time controls do you play? Cheating is much more prevalent in rapid than blitz, with correspondence probably being the worst of all. It's unlucky for people who don't like speed chess. The only solution to this…
I was also surprised to learn (years ago) BuzzFeed has a decently-sized investigative team
There's also an issue of community/people you'd work with. (Fair or not) there's a strong perception that the current COBOL devs are people that are close to retirement and not exactly eager to take a junior dev under…
I'm with you, but I wonder if this is the sort of "only people on this site care and the vast majority of the readership wouldn't use it" thing ... I'm not sure it is, but it could be, and I wonder if somebody with…