> The whole notion that they're going rogue is marketing Sounds like motivated reasoning from someone afraid of having their job stolen by rogue super-human AI. Keep crying, weakling.
> I've been friends with Jack over 15 years now so I'm inclined to take him at his word That's all I needed to hear to completely disregard your motivated reasoning. Edit: I've hit the rate limit, but I'd like to…
> If I release a wild monkey in your rare antiques shop, it’s my fault as the responsible party for the monkey. Sounds like motivated reasoning from someone worried about having their job stolen by wild monkeys.
If AI is as powerful as an atomic bomb why could it only manage to kill a couple hundred Iranian school girls? Surely a truly society-shifting technology could manage to execute 1000 innocent children at least.
> Commented on a story about how these agents didn't go rogue at all, since it's fucking software run by humans, obvious to most of us except the people who freak out. This is a website about making people freak out…
The shirtless body of the average LLM user: https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/07/elon-m...
> he who carries the heart of a machine in his breast loses his simplicity. A lot of these AI guys seem pretty simple to me...
Thank you for blessing us with your presence, sir.
> It's like half the people have turned off their brain. LLMs are for people who want to turn off their brain. If you want your team to improve, you should lead by example and stop using LLMs. You need to create an…
> but you're completely devoid of empathy if you can't understand these posts. These posts are about saying "fuck you" to software developers. They're having fun making people scared but really they're just trying to…
Wow, I had never considered it, but it really seems like a huge benefit that all implementations in the company codebase are now perpetually refactored.
> Who likes typing code It really does seem like the target audience of LLM users are people who never learned to use Vim. > And who likes planning, architecting, directing a team, steering and giving advice, reviewing…
Don't concede the "power tools" analogy. LLM are not capable of building maintainable software.
These narratives are designed for people who want to see programmers taken down a peg. The truth is that LLM generated code is not sustainable and the people hawking it are operating recklessly.
OpenAI/Anthropic's marketing here reminds me of the way colonizers will exalt criminal groups in the regions they wish to dominate. Similarly, these AI firms have exalted a caste of lower-performing engineers who have…
> The whole notion that they're going rogue is marketing Sounds like motivated reasoning from someone afraid of having their job stolen by rogue super-human AI. Keep crying, weakling.
> I've been friends with Jack over 15 years now so I'm inclined to take him at his word That's all I needed to hear to completely disregard your motivated reasoning. Edit: I've hit the rate limit, but I'd like to…
> If I release a wild monkey in your rare antiques shop, it’s my fault as the responsible party for the monkey. Sounds like motivated reasoning from someone worried about having their job stolen by wild monkeys.
If AI is as powerful as an atomic bomb why could it only manage to kill a couple hundred Iranian school girls? Surely a truly society-shifting technology could manage to execute 1000 innocent children at least.
> Commented on a story about how these agents didn't go rogue at all, since it's fucking software run by humans, obvious to most of us except the people who freak out. This is a website about making people freak out…
The shirtless body of the average LLM user: https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/07/elon-m...
> he who carries the heart of a machine in his breast loses his simplicity. A lot of these AI guys seem pretty simple to me...
Thank you for blessing us with your presence, sir.
> It's like half the people have turned off their brain. LLMs are for people who want to turn off their brain. If you want your team to improve, you should lead by example and stop using LLMs. You need to create an…
> but you're completely devoid of empathy if you can't understand these posts. These posts are about saying "fuck you" to software developers. They're having fun making people scared but really they're just trying to…
Wow, I had never considered it, but it really seems like a huge benefit that all implementations in the company codebase are now perpetually refactored.
> Who likes typing code It really does seem like the target audience of LLM users are people who never learned to use Vim. > And who likes planning, architecting, directing a team, steering and giving advice, reviewing…
Don't concede the "power tools" analogy. LLM are not capable of building maintainable software.
These narratives are designed for people who want to see programmers taken down a peg. The truth is that LLM generated code is not sustainable and the people hawking it are operating recklessly.
OpenAI/Anthropic's marketing here reminds me of the way colonizers will exalt criminal groups in the regions they wish to dominate. Similarly, these AI firms have exalted a caste of lower-performing engineers who have…