poor bipolar
are people still learning python? eons ago when I last looked at it, people were still making this very question LOL it's the curse of open source software: as long as the source is out there, people with legacy…
right, most people are pigs I'm a dog and only eat bone marrow...
a giant turkey, indeed probably even the motion was likely very similar to that of birds... you know, those careful steps one after the other of chicken...
racket is a superset of scheme. I write perfectly valid scheme code and run in racket even with the #lang racket tag... now, let's not get started on RxRS compatibility...
its features are comparable to old Lisps from the 70's, prior to Scheme and Common Lisp. Nothing really new here at all and lots of old bugs passing for features.
it's actually a very small vocal minority who hates microsoft. They hate microsoft because microsoft means ubiquitous standardized flatten programming environments the way managers like, with sheeple programmers…
Microsoft Research is kinda like a country club for retired compsci laureates...
Yeah, there'll come a time when to build systems all you need is a bunch of people talking to reach a consensus: how much to pay for a third party to write it for them. oops, it seems it already happens today...
I wish there was a language called harmless which common folk could use to express common thought without any fear. It would go like this: do this do this and that and that too do this amen No branching nor decision…
Typed Racket combines all the inconvenience of type declarations with all the performance provided by a dynamic language.
poor bipolar
are people still learning python? eons ago when I last looked at it, people were still making this very question LOL it's the curse of open source software: as long as the source is out there, people with legacy…
right, most people are pigs I'm a dog and only eat bone marrow...
a giant turkey, indeed probably even the motion was likely very similar to that of birds... you know, those careful steps one after the other of chicken...
racket is a superset of scheme. I write perfectly valid scheme code and run in racket even with the #lang racket tag... now, let's not get started on RxRS compatibility...
its features are comparable to old Lisps from the 70's, prior to Scheme and Common Lisp. Nothing really new here at all and lots of old bugs passing for features.
it's actually a very small vocal minority who hates microsoft. They hate microsoft because microsoft means ubiquitous standardized flatten programming environments the way managers like, with sheeple programmers…
Microsoft Research is kinda like a country club for retired compsci laureates...
Yeah, there'll come a time when to build systems all you need is a bunch of people talking to reach a consensus: how much to pay for a third party to write it for them. oops, it seems it already happens today...
I wish there was a language called harmless which common folk could use to express common thought without any fear. It would go like this: do this do this and that and that too do this amen No branching nor decision…
Typed Racket combines all the inconvenience of type declarations with all the performance provided by a dynamic language.