> I’ve been listening to mates whose companies adopted Claude wholesale, only for their AI use to become a double digit percentage of their salary. sigh...yep. that's us.
Yes my first instinct is to roll my eyes at these efforts but we'll probably all get something better in the end from all the competition.
I saw this too and I'm really confused.
is it the guy in Nebraska from the xkcd comic
[dead]
Yes AI content, even when correct and insightful, has a feeling of being disposable. Maybe it's because there is no person behind it.
i like this comment.
can we just get Opus 5.1 already
i've noticed recently that some agentic TUIs have introduced a dashboard of sorts for different sessions that you access by just pressing left arrow. i wonder if they are trying to solve some of the problems mentioned…
yeah the conflict of interest here is staggering.
everyone is shipping their in house solutions and they all seem...kinda the same.
yeah they were probably thinking, "we really gave away the transformer recipe for free?"
so..you guys have $20k+ rigs?
hah. it's true. no interest in uncertainty except when forced.
very cool. thanks!
I've been wondering what the point of a lot of these new multiplexer projects are when tmux is so extensible. I'd be curious to see eactly what you've done. Care to share a tmux config?
I really appreciated this post. I just turned staff. Putting up my antennae to probe what problems are out there is a skill that I am trying to hone. However I find that I am often blocked in some way that is hard to…
lol
The question i wonder about is, when will an event come along that persuades everyone that human understanding is still required? Or will it never come?
And what about problems that cannot be one-shotted but helped along?
I am feeling this a lot lately. Getting the most out of agents seems to require being able to ask the right question. And how can you ask the right questions without deep domain expertise?
Claude says this is funny.
Yeah, AI is a general purpose technology, on a par with the introduction of the computer itself. Analogies to tools seems inappropriate.
I have a deep expertise in a domain and when I read that example it was incredibly edifying. I regularly encounter statements that are so concentrated with information that it becomes opaque and I cannot interpret it…
oh, interesting idea. edit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49114639
> I’ve been listening to mates whose companies adopted Claude wholesale, only for their AI use to become a double digit percentage of their salary. sigh...yep. that's us.
Yes my first instinct is to roll my eyes at these efforts but we'll probably all get something better in the end from all the competition.
I saw this too and I'm really confused.
is it the guy in Nebraska from the xkcd comic
[dead]
Yes AI content, even when correct and insightful, has a feeling of being disposable. Maybe it's because there is no person behind it.
i like this comment.
can we just get Opus 5.1 already
i've noticed recently that some agentic TUIs have introduced a dashboard of sorts for different sessions that you access by just pressing left arrow. i wonder if they are trying to solve some of the problems mentioned…
yeah the conflict of interest here is staggering.
everyone is shipping their in house solutions and they all seem...kinda the same.
yeah they were probably thinking, "we really gave away the transformer recipe for free?"
so..you guys have $20k+ rigs?
hah. it's true. no interest in uncertainty except when forced.
very cool. thanks!
I've been wondering what the point of a lot of these new multiplexer projects are when tmux is so extensible. I'd be curious to see eactly what you've done. Care to share a tmux config?
I really appreciated this post. I just turned staff. Putting up my antennae to probe what problems are out there is a skill that I am trying to hone. However I find that I am often blocked in some way that is hard to…
lol
The question i wonder about is, when will an event come along that persuades everyone that human understanding is still required? Or will it never come?
And what about problems that cannot be one-shotted but helped along?
I am feeling this a lot lately. Getting the most out of agents seems to require being able to ask the right question. And how can you ask the right questions without deep domain expertise?
Claude says this is funny.
Yeah, AI is a general purpose technology, on a par with the introduction of the computer itself. Analogies to tools seems inappropriate.
I have a deep expertise in a domain and when I read that example it was incredibly edifying. I regularly encounter statements that are so concentrated with information that it becomes opaque and I cannot interpret it…
oh, interesting idea. edit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49114639