The overarching term ist cultic, I believe.
> one-to-one and onto funktion I don't think that's the established terminology. > How do you propose to interpret all of these groups geometrically, How do you not? This pure maths wank really grinds my gears. Of…
I'm not sure I unterstand. Are you saying addition was not a natural transformation, in contrast to shifting? I do have a Problem reasoning about binarry addition in terms of shift operations, but in the simplest case,…
The overarching term ist cultic, I believe.
> one-to-one and onto funktion I don't think that's the established terminology. > How do you propose to interpret all of these groups geometrically, How do you not? This pure maths wank really grinds my gears. Of…
I'm not sure I unterstand. Are you saying addition was not a natural transformation, in contrast to shifting? I do have a Problem reasoning about binarry addition in terms of shift operations, but in the simplest case,…