Well-put. To state that our ethical standard must be vigilantly maintained goes without saying. To put the treatment of these cold-blooded killers first is unnerving at best.
While I see where you are coming from, I think we can all unanimously and irrevocably agree that posting child porn and snuff videos to social media is pretty damn trashy.
> Facebook not protecting content moderators from mental trauma > Facebook in the past has said all of its content reviewers have access to mental health resources, including trained professionals onsite for both…
This threw me off, too. I initially thought the article was trying to say that there is less empathy for those diagnosed with a biological predisposition because it is easier to legitimize than someone's feelings.
Ah I see, thank you. I've also mostly left FB, keeping the account around only for events and messenger. It has become so cluttered. It really is on its last legs.
Curious as to what you mean by 'the "brand tax" of Facebook in the current climate.'
Well-put. To state that our ethical standard must be vigilantly maintained goes without saying. To put the treatment of these cold-blooded killers first is unnerving at best.
While I see where you are coming from, I think we can all unanimously and irrevocably agree that posting child porn and snuff videos to social media is pretty damn trashy.
> Facebook not protecting content moderators from mental trauma > Facebook in the past has said all of its content reviewers have access to mental health resources, including trained professionals onsite for both…
This threw me off, too. I initially thought the article was trying to say that there is less empathy for those diagnosed with a biological predisposition because it is easier to legitimize than someone's feelings.
Ah I see, thank you. I've also mostly left FB, keeping the account around only for events and messenger. It has become so cluttered. It really is on its last legs.
Curious as to what you mean by 'the "brand tax" of Facebook in the current climate.'