>We barely get any donations. We barely have money That's relative and your wording is slippery here. What is "barely no money"? $50? $100? In any case, donated money should be dealt with in a better way. Even an…
That's a really bold statement to make. And why not use a proven secure parser in the first place?
But why create your own parser instead of using proven-secure ones? Sounds like NIH Syndrome to me.
Apparently, we can't use the name "Tox": http://tox.readthedocs.org/ Here are the most liked alternatives proposed on anther thread: tala whispr mila aspis orwell nota extasi eave fabula
>We barely get any donations. We barely have money That's relative and your wording is slippery here. What is "barely no money"? $50? $100? In any case, donated money should be dealt with in a better way. Even an…
That's a really bold statement to make. And why not use a proven secure parser in the first place?
But why create your own parser instead of using proven-secure ones? Sounds like NIH Syndrome to me.
Apparently, we can't use the name "Tox": http://tox.readthedocs.org/ Here are the most liked alternatives proposed on anther thread: tala whispr mila aspis orwell nota extasi eave fabula