> Agree! My only concern is - is the judicial system fast enough, and resilient enough? We already have the laws. It is just software. But somehow people are confused that it is not.
Having a philosophy is okay, but people must understand the social coencequences as well. Maybe similar example would be that people allow only assembly in their projects and compiled languages are forbidden. The impact…
I feel like people are just taking the easy shortcut when making these policies and banning AI completely. With AI, it is very easy to make sloppy code where nobody didn't put much thought on it. But AI can be really…
In many way it is, because it allows defeting many incorret arguments people in power make, or simply asking where is the cheapest product ”X” with one question. Or simply be more aware or any kind of scam people or…
Many claims but no clear evidence that they actually find significantly more severe issues that open models.
> Altman and Bubeck claim that because the proof used different scaling parameters and analytical steps, it's not related, Is Altman even mathematican these days?
How the same people can have access to this information and be acknowledged? Completely different place.
They are completely different things with different consequences. Someone can point to the sky and prove that the sun is there.
I think that in the end it does not matter, anymore. It is inevitable that most of the text now and in the future is at least reviewed by LLM. We should criticize whether text is poorly written, inaccurate, wastes words…
All these "is this AI" checkers should be banned, as they never can reach 100% accuracy.
To have a really good harness, it seems that you need a separate one for every different project you are working with.
There is a saying that ideas are cheap. Only delivery matters.
The real advancement, not brute forcing mathematical equations like some company does and claims revolutionary breakthrough. How many ideas like this has come from AI companies' models?
I have been using it today the whole day and it is definitely better than Luna. Great that bench agrees.
1. Not storing secrets properly or using hardcoded secrets 2. Wild use of webviews/iframes sometimes easily propagates as XSS in phones 3. Incorrect client-side OAuth 2.0 configuration e.g. with schema-based redirect…
You don’t believe how often people leave secrets in the app or use webviews and iframes badly, misconfigure OAuth in client side and so on. There are many issues where secure API does not help.
This is probably the end now. People don't debate anymore whether they should write only in assembly vs. in C. Sometimes new abstractions emerge and they replace something completely. This time the abstraction was LLM.
> You just install it on your phone and use the app. Some people on the cybersecurity side are starting to cry....
So it is price increment in the end, if new pro model comes with the new pro price.
On top of that, they don't make all BS statements or malicious tricks used by some unnamed entities.
European users have right to be forgotten. Waiting for the court order to delete all models.
It is a very old idea. But it matters a lot in iPhone’s scale. Many people will have it without buying a separate device.
The only positive side is that it is harder for students to feed university exercises to the agent in cybersecurity and expect it to make them all.
> In keeping with our commitment to user responsibility, following the official launch of V4.1 Flash and prior to the release of V4.1 Pro, all requests to the Pro model will be routed to V4.1 Flash and billed at Flash's…
That seems to be indeed true. I guess it gets validated quite soon.
> Agree! My only concern is - is the judicial system fast enough, and resilient enough? We already have the laws. It is just software. But somehow people are confused that it is not.
Having a philosophy is okay, but people must understand the social coencequences as well. Maybe similar example would be that people allow only assembly in their projects and compiled languages are forbidden. The impact…
I feel like people are just taking the easy shortcut when making these policies and banning AI completely. With AI, it is very easy to make sloppy code where nobody didn't put much thought on it. But AI can be really…
In many way it is, because it allows defeting many incorret arguments people in power make, or simply asking where is the cheapest product ”X” with one question. Or simply be more aware or any kind of scam people or…
Many claims but no clear evidence that they actually find significantly more severe issues that open models.
> Altman and Bubeck claim that because the proof used different scaling parameters and analytical steps, it's not related, Is Altman even mathematican these days?
How the same people can have access to this information and be acknowledged? Completely different place.
They are completely different things with different consequences. Someone can point to the sky and prove that the sun is there.
I think that in the end it does not matter, anymore. It is inevitable that most of the text now and in the future is at least reviewed by LLM. We should criticize whether text is poorly written, inaccurate, wastes words…
All these "is this AI" checkers should be banned, as they never can reach 100% accuracy.
To have a really good harness, it seems that you need a separate one for every different project you are working with.
There is a saying that ideas are cheap. Only delivery matters.
The real advancement, not brute forcing mathematical equations like some company does and claims revolutionary breakthrough. How many ideas like this has come from AI companies' models?
I have been using it today the whole day and it is definitely better than Luna. Great that bench agrees.
1. Not storing secrets properly or using hardcoded secrets 2. Wild use of webviews/iframes sometimes easily propagates as XSS in phones 3. Incorrect client-side OAuth 2.0 configuration e.g. with schema-based redirect…
You don’t believe how often people leave secrets in the app or use webviews and iframes badly, misconfigure OAuth in client side and so on. There are many issues where secure API does not help.
This is probably the end now. People don't debate anymore whether they should write only in assembly vs. in C. Sometimes new abstractions emerge and they replace something completely. This time the abstraction was LLM.
> You just install it on your phone and use the app. Some people on the cybersecurity side are starting to cry....
So it is price increment in the end, if new pro model comes with the new pro price.
On top of that, they don't make all BS statements or malicious tricks used by some unnamed entities.
European users have right to be forgotten. Waiting for the court order to delete all models.
It is a very old idea. But it matters a lot in iPhone’s scale. Many people will have it without buying a separate device.
The only positive side is that it is harder for students to feed university exercises to the agent in cybersecurity and expect it to make them all.
> In keeping with our commitment to user responsibility, following the official launch of V4.1 Flash and prior to the release of V4.1 Pro, all requests to the Pro model will be routed to V4.1 Flash and billed at Flash's…
That seems to be indeed true. I guess it gets validated quite soon.