> How did they not become spacex/starlink You need to go big first with the rockets. If you have the rockets, everything else is easy later on. Collect millions from others to launch the satellites in the meantime.
> admit it because it meant more work and that their past existing work was shite. And that is why it is now more usable. More affordable.
"Popular" usually means that supporting many use cases. Many use cases means a lot of code. Probably means increased complexity. Tailored hyperspecific firmware is much more usable now and maybe you can even formally…
You can technically send then all the time and it is enough that they boot once. No need to know the time beforehand.
This looks great. Quite new one, hopefully will be maintained.
Thanks. I am already using this, it seems to be the best so far. But I feel something is still missing from there by the usability aspect. It also uses NextJS which I don't know what to think about...
I just wish there would be more pure JMAP email clients. But maybe soon!
> Personally, I do expect SpaceX to face consequences in the years to come. Probably only and only when AOC or someone else from Bernie's camp gets to be president. Otherwise, unlikely.
I even forgot that it exist. I tried it many times but it was not good enough. Eventually I switched to Zed since that was better. Probably Zed killed it.
Some repo owners just review code that others submit, and don't write anything themselves. If the review process stays the same, does it matter? The fault is not generating the code with AI, rather, with faulty review…
Based on translating their Chinese text on Firefox, it says "per card": > The current service throughput of a single cluster is 155 trillion tokens per day, and the overall revenue is $38 per hour (at the lowest price)…
It is not even Russia in this case. Just look what Meta and Trump and friends have been doing
What are the benefits of jj if in the end everything is still on git backend?
And probably OLED or something close to that
Without an account, you can’t even properly use your freezer
The main issue is that the attention economy and social pressure are so hard to break. People keep using WhatsApp because it is convenient and everyone is there. There are no other reasons.
The best games when you were around 10-12 years old.
> Or you build a cartel of apirin sellers to do some price fixing. They are really trying to do that by getting that regulatory capture
> 1) If a firm spends $99k on compute to replace a $100k engineer and produces 5x the output, how is that not a 5x increase in aggregate labor productivity? I think they are saying that with 99k pure compute you are…
There is named entity in the end, and "we" statement. But yeah, I was speaking in general, not so specifically about this page. It is better than most who do this.
There is nothing I dislike more than people using AI to generate tens of pages in text and then expect people to read them, when they did not read them themselves.
Some people also have tried the paid new feature prioritization where it later lands for everyone. I think it worked in some projects but project must have been really good otherwise.
Not particularly referencing to this link, but usually severity is made more severe than it actually is. One kind of sensationalism is usually used.
Depends how much involment there is for the end result. Does using traditional, digital paint tools make people artists?
They excpect fame and may make things look worse than they are
> How did they not become spacex/starlink You need to go big first with the rockets. If you have the rockets, everything else is easy later on. Collect millions from others to launch the satellites in the meantime.
> admit it because it meant more work and that their past existing work was shite. And that is why it is now more usable. More affordable.
"Popular" usually means that supporting many use cases. Many use cases means a lot of code. Probably means increased complexity. Tailored hyperspecific firmware is much more usable now and maybe you can even formally…
You can technically send then all the time and it is enough that they boot once. No need to know the time beforehand.
This looks great. Quite new one, hopefully will be maintained.
Thanks. I am already using this, it seems to be the best so far. But I feel something is still missing from there by the usability aspect. It also uses NextJS which I don't know what to think about...
I just wish there would be more pure JMAP email clients. But maybe soon!
> Personally, I do expect SpaceX to face consequences in the years to come. Probably only and only when AOC or someone else from Bernie's camp gets to be president. Otherwise, unlikely.
I even forgot that it exist. I tried it many times but it was not good enough. Eventually I switched to Zed since that was better. Probably Zed killed it.
Some repo owners just review code that others submit, and don't write anything themselves. If the review process stays the same, does it matter? The fault is not generating the code with AI, rather, with faulty review…
Based on translating their Chinese text on Firefox, it says "per card": > The current service throughput of a single cluster is 155 trillion tokens per day, and the overall revenue is $38 per hour (at the lowest price)…
It is not even Russia in this case. Just look what Meta and Trump and friends have been doing
What are the benefits of jj if in the end everything is still on git backend?
And probably OLED or something close to that
Without an account, you can’t even properly use your freezer
The main issue is that the attention economy and social pressure are so hard to break. People keep using WhatsApp because it is convenient and everyone is there. There are no other reasons.
The best games when you were around 10-12 years old.
> Or you build a cartel of apirin sellers to do some price fixing. They are really trying to do that by getting that regulatory capture
> 1) If a firm spends $99k on compute to replace a $100k engineer and produces 5x the output, how is that not a 5x increase in aggregate labor productivity? I think they are saying that with 99k pure compute you are…
There is named entity in the end, and "we" statement. But yeah, I was speaking in general, not so specifically about this page. It is better than most who do this.
There is nothing I dislike more than people using AI to generate tens of pages in text and then expect people to read them, when they did not read them themselves.
Some people also have tried the paid new feature prioritization where it later lands for everyone. I think it worked in some projects but project must have been really good otherwise.
Not particularly referencing to this link, but usually severity is made more severe than it actually is. One kind of sensationalism is usually used.
Depends how much involment there is for the end result. Does using traditional, digital paint tools make people artists?
They excpect fame and may make things look worse than they are