Ah ah ah I totally should get into it! When time allows it :-)
The title is a reference to diy perks, who has built the same camera and called it a "next-level" camera in its YouTube video. Thus, 'I built _the_ "next-level" camera' instead of a '_a_ "next-level"' camera :-)
I think that actually it applies to exposure too? Because a M43 sensor is going to be "half" the size of Full Frame, which means that the pixels will have 1/4 of the area, so you need 4 times the light to have the same…
Well, obviously large format cameras are nothing new. The point here is: for these kind of apertures and wide angles we need a super large area to expose, and usually either (a) they're smaller with digital cameras, or…
To be honest, if that's not the part where physics fail, it's going to be the actual production of the lenses... Either way, there's no such lens available to the market.
This is an option I wanted to experiment with, but when I decided to use it for the short film it died off in my mind. (I even checked how many fps we'd get with a scanner...)
To be honest, the aperture of our eyes is so small that, yeah, we do blur background, but nowhere an near as most lenses do.
> we're so obsessed with shallow depth-of-field as a sign of "quality" and/or meaning. Nicco here. I didn't use a shallow depth of field here for either reason. I wanted it because all of those scenes are memories of…
Sorry, I promise I'll spend more time spell checking my articles from now on.
And keep in mind crop factor applies to aperture too! A 50mm f1 on M43 in equivalent to 100mm f2.
I think so, but what exactly depends on what you need. Commonly liked features are: - User intuitive widgets that can be easily dragged around in panels with a third party store directly in Plasma itself, containing…
Ah ah ah I totally should get into it! When time allows it :-)
The title is a reference to diy perks, who has built the same camera and called it a "next-level" camera in its YouTube video. Thus, 'I built _the_ "next-level" camera' instead of a '_a_ "next-level"' camera :-)
I think that actually it applies to exposure too? Because a M43 sensor is going to be "half" the size of Full Frame, which means that the pixels will have 1/4 of the area, so you need 4 times the light to have the same…
Well, obviously large format cameras are nothing new. The point here is: for these kind of apertures and wide angles we need a super large area to expose, and usually either (a) they're smaller with digital cameras, or…
To be honest, if that's not the part where physics fail, it's going to be the actual production of the lenses... Either way, there's no such lens available to the market.
This is an option I wanted to experiment with, but when I decided to use it for the short film it died off in my mind. (I even checked how many fps we'd get with a scanner...)
To be honest, the aperture of our eyes is so small that, yeah, we do blur background, but nowhere an near as most lenses do.
> we're so obsessed with shallow depth-of-field as a sign of "quality" and/or meaning. Nicco here. I didn't use a shallow depth of field here for either reason. I wanted it because all of those scenes are memories of…
Sorry, I promise I'll spend more time spell checking my articles from now on.
And keep in mind crop factor applies to aperture too! A 50mm f1 on M43 in equivalent to 100mm f2.
I think so, but what exactly depends on what you need. Commonly liked features are: - User intuitive widgets that can be easily dragged around in panels with a third party store directly in Plasma itself, containing…