I'm sure we'll be in touch. I suggest you join the mailing list, then you'll be able to track our progress (and you'll be the first to know once we have a working compiler). Do give my regards to John Reppy, who I…
The implementation has not progressed at all since 1999, when Harlequin folded. It doesn't do defunctorization, so probably can't compete with MLton on performance (but it does have an IDE including a REPL, unlike…
Indeed, LispWorks was Harlequin's first actual product, paid for itself over many years and still does today in the hands of several of the original developers who acquired it after Harlequin went bust. The next product…
Let's get it working again and see. On the original target platforms (SPARC/Solaris, and then MIPS/Irix) it was quicker than that era's SML/NJ on our favourite benchmark (recompiling the whole of MLWorks itself), by…
I'm sure we'll be in touch. I suggest you join the mailing list, then you'll be able to track our progress (and you'll be the first to know once we have a working compiler). Do give my regards to John Reppy, who I…
The implementation has not progressed at all since 1999, when Harlequin folded. It doesn't do defunctorization, so probably can't compete with MLton on performance (but it does have an IDE including a REPL, unlike…
Indeed, LispWorks was Harlequin's first actual product, paid for itself over many years and still does today in the hands of several of the original developers who acquired it after Harlequin went bust. The next product…
Let's get it working again and see. On the original target platforms (SPARC/Solaris, and then MIPS/Irix) it was quicker than that era's SML/NJ on our favourite benchmark (recompiling the whole of MLWorks itself), by…