nicola_alessi
- Karma
- 0
- Created
- ()
- Submissions
- 0
-
Shipped today. The benchmarks are real: 87.6% SWE-bench (from 80.8%), +13% on coding tasks, 3x more resolved production tasks on Rakuten-SWE-Bench. But there are a few changes that compound on each other for token…
-
I ran a controlled benchmark on AI coding agents (42 runs, FastAPI, Claude Sonnet 4.6) and found something that broke my mental model of LLM costs. The setup: I built an MCP server that pre-indexes a codebase into a…
-
I built an MCP server (vexp) that pre-indexes a codebase into a dependency graph and serves only relevant code to AI coding agents. While benchmarking it, I found something I wasn't looking for. The expected results…
-
I got tired of watching Claude Code read entire files when it needed one function. Built an MCP server that pre-computes a dependency graph with tree-sitter and serves only the relevant code nodes to the agent. Ran a…
-
I've spent months building tooling for AI coding agents and hit something I can't fully explain. If you give an agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) a tool to save observations — "save_observation: persist this insight…
-
I built vexp because AI coding agents have two expensive problems: they waste tokens reading irrelevant code, and they forget everything between sessions. The token problem: agents read entire files linearly to build…
-
I built vexp to solve two problems I kept hitting with AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.): 1. Token waste: agents read entire files linearly to understand a codebase. On a medium TypeScript project, a single…
-
I've been building vexp for the past months to solve a problem that kept bugging me: AI coding agents waste most of their context window reading code they don't need. The problem When you ask Claude Code or Cursor to…
-
For the last year, I've been obsessed with a problem: finding something to watch is a chore. The interfaces of Netflix, Prime, and others feel like slot machines designed for maximum engagement, not for matching my…
-
The Problem: LLMs are terrible at understanding eCommerce sites. They: Hallucinate prices/specs from messy HTML Waste tokens on UI boilerplate (headers, popups, ads) Struggle with real-time inventory/pricing updates Our…
-
We've forked Answer.AI's llms.txt to solve a specific problem: how eCommerce sites with 10K+ products can expose clean product data to LLMs without inefficient scraping. What it does: site-llms.xml is a machine-readable…
-
Every solution I've seen either: 1. Replicates Google's ad-driven model (but worse) 2. Claims 'AI' but acts as a black box Yet we all waste hours daily on: - Decoding fake reviews - Reverse-engineering SEO-optimized…