Yes, it is a bug, but until it's fixed it's a potential attack vector.
Hopefully we'll see some antitrust action from the EU over this if they do drop the URL bar.
Suddenly "www.com"'s value has skyrocketed in the eyes of scammers. How about: * login.<target_site>.www.com -> login.<target_site>.com * members.<target_site>.www.com -> members.<target_site>.com Even some carefully…
That's really helpful, thanks.
> If China wants to subsidize African development or consumption, what is the problem with that? They're following the West's playbook of buying influence at the UN, etc. It's Chinese "soft power". > If China loans more…
The advantage it had was a cavalier approach to piracy iirc. Didn't they use that to bootstrap before going legit?
How much equity do you need to give away to get VC money for an unproven business idea? Is there a ballpark figure? I heard like $100k for 20% or something but I guess that's more like angel investing? What's the…
Yes, it is a bug, but until it's fixed it's a potential attack vector.
Hopefully we'll see some antitrust action from the EU over this if they do drop the URL bar.
Suddenly "www.com"'s value has skyrocketed in the eyes of scammers. How about: * login.<target_site>.www.com -> login.<target_site>.com * members.<target_site>.www.com -> members.<target_site>.com Even some carefully…
That's really helpful, thanks.
> If China wants to subsidize African development or consumption, what is the problem with that? They're following the West's playbook of buying influence at the UN, etc. It's Chinese "soft power". > If China loans more…
The advantage it had was a cavalier approach to piracy iirc. Didn't they use that to bootstrap before going legit?
How much equity do you need to give away to get VC money for an unproven business idea? Is there a ballpark figure? I heard like $100k for 20% or something but I guess that's more like angel investing? What's the…