Can you prove your statement by providing an example please?
That’s because the shortages you experienced were real. The shortages we’ve had over the pandemic are greatly exaggerated by our trash tabloid media which vice is a prime offender.
Ivermectin? Actual studies now prove it effective. YouTube banned people for talking about it and people died because of it. How’s that? There are too many one sentence questions on these issues of censorship. I would…
what do you mean “what damage was done”?
What sorta shit conversation is this not trying to have? Your question doesn’t even make sense here. Collect that fucking .25cents tho bro
Ahh yes you mean like having Peter dazick or whatever his name is fact check covid source material on Facebook? When his eco health alliance funded it? Yeah. Fact checks alright. Laughable.
Well. Count me up as one who was a die hard Bernie supporter who has made a very hard right turn as my former home (as a progressive Dem) seems to be arguing in favor of censorship at every turn. If you want more people…
What exactly were the ethics behind removing any reference to wuhan institute of virology being the source of covid? Ethics to you does not mean ethics to me.
I thought we just heard for 6 months that private companies can ban whoever they want…
It’s not a privacy minded standpoint. It’s the god damn 4th amendment.
Hell go back and check out what happened to quest over the carnivore shit. “Our” government has been pulling this shit since the 90s.
What the hell kind of glowie account is this?
You’re right - this gated world didn’t need to happen. Sure would have been nice if American scenarists and eco health didn’t continue gain of function research after it was outlawed in the us. So uh what about this?…
Very good point. Because there are some saying things that you think are clearly misguided we must limit all misinformation based on what you think is right. Can you believe how racist it was to think it came from a…
Did you just link a screen cap of a Twitter rant and call it “related information”. Do you think that adds credibility to your argument? It doesn’t.
Can you prove your statement by providing an example please?
That’s because the shortages you experienced were real. The shortages we’ve had over the pandemic are greatly exaggerated by our trash tabloid media which vice is a prime offender.
Ivermectin? Actual studies now prove it effective. YouTube banned people for talking about it and people died because of it. How’s that? There are too many one sentence questions on these issues of censorship. I would…
what do you mean “what damage was done”?
What sorta shit conversation is this not trying to have? Your question doesn’t even make sense here. Collect that fucking .25cents tho bro
Ahh yes you mean like having Peter dazick or whatever his name is fact check covid source material on Facebook? When his eco health alliance funded it? Yeah. Fact checks alright. Laughable.
Well. Count me up as one who was a die hard Bernie supporter who has made a very hard right turn as my former home (as a progressive Dem) seems to be arguing in favor of censorship at every turn. If you want more people…
What exactly were the ethics behind removing any reference to wuhan institute of virology being the source of covid? Ethics to you does not mean ethics to me.
I thought we just heard for 6 months that private companies can ban whoever they want…
It’s not a privacy minded standpoint. It’s the god damn 4th amendment.
Hell go back and check out what happened to quest over the carnivore shit. “Our” government has been pulling this shit since the 90s.
What the hell kind of glowie account is this?
You’re right - this gated world didn’t need to happen. Sure would have been nice if American scenarists and eco health didn’t continue gain of function research after it was outlawed in the us. So uh what about this?…
Very good point. Because there are some saying things that you think are clearly misguided we must limit all misinformation based on what you think is right. Can you believe how racist it was to think it came from a…
Did you just link a screen cap of a Twitter rant and call it “related information”. Do you think that adds credibility to your argument? It doesn’t.