Exactly my thoughts! Calls himself a digital nomad with a photo of just two suitcases, yet each photo is a different wardrobe and a different country. Either I'm just being jealous, or he is indeed this vain, or both.
Isn't the proof for Hamiltonian cycles? From what I could understand from your link to CHM92, it only requires a cyclic graph to stop, which isn't necessarily supposed to touch all vertices. Is that right?
Exactly my thoughts! Calls himself a digital nomad with a photo of just two suitcases, yet each photo is a different wardrobe and a different country. Either I'm just being jealous, or he is indeed this vain, or both.
Isn't the proof for Hamiltonian cycles? From what I could understand from your link to CHM92, it only requires a cyclic graph to stop, which isn't necessarily supposed to touch all vertices. Is that right?