In short, I would say. (Main) advantages: - The Cx syntax is a lot easier to learn/debug than VHDL and Verilog (and SystemVerilog, and SystemC) - Cx is easier to use for making more complex systems (it's a structured…
You can download the tool on www.synflow.com, start using it with our online course on https://eliademy.com/catalog/basic-of-the-cx-language.html and the output of the compilers are VHDL and Verilog.
That's a good point Scott. Asynchronous clock domains are indeed complex and it took us time to manage them efficiently. When you need to connect different clock domains with Cx/ngDesign you have to synchronize the…
You're welcome csirac2. I'm curious to hear about your opinion of our toolchain!
Hi Scott, I'm a co-founder of Synflow. You're right, the VHDL on our website is a bit overly verbose. I will update the website with the right version of the code that day. And I also agree on your point. This is why we…
In short, I would say. (Main) advantages: - The Cx syntax is a lot easier to learn/debug than VHDL and Verilog (and SystemVerilog, and SystemC) - Cx is easier to use for making more complex systems (it's a structured…
You can download the tool on www.synflow.com, start using it with our online course on https://eliademy.com/catalog/basic-of-the-cx-language.html and the output of the compilers are VHDL and Verilog.
That's a good point Scott. Asynchronous clock domains are indeed complex and it took us time to manage them efficiently. When you need to connect different clock domains with Cx/ngDesign you have to synchronize the…
You're welcome csirac2. I'm curious to hear about your opinion of our toolchain!
Hi Scott, I'm a co-founder of Synflow. You're right, the VHDL on our website is a bit overly verbose. I will update the website with the right version of the code that day. And I also agree on your point. This is why we…