so we're on the same page, here's how I read your comment: "This is a shockingly ill thought-out comment tbh." <-- the casual bigotry; "I don't want to assumr you're an LLM" <-- yes you do, dont be a dunce. this is the…
Lol
no, we're talking shit about people who express their bigotry with anticlanker sentiment, calling humans (whom they disagree with) llms.
Ah, and we now see casual bigotry emerging from the anticlanker crowd. What a shame.
yep, and when the llms can pack flatware, stamp license plates or clean bedpans, I'll argue we shouldn't have humans doing that bullshit work either.
Its only distracts the distractable. Does anyone ever read product announcement blog posts like they were great literature? Ive always just skimmed, theyve always been throwaway writing to me. I’d rather the humans…
I’ll argue mozzies are responsible for more suffering than humans any day of the week. They need to go. Lets just get our targeting good enough.
We’ll have to agree to disagree on this one; anytime someone has to scam the markets to survive it’s my opinion they deserve jail and ruination, not a harem.
With several large bets on the table with starship that have yet to play out. Remember mars by 2024? I think that was around the time they started accepting deposits on tesla semi.
Which?
Fudge, I really need to carve out time today to play with zeroserve. Very cool stuff
Quatsch. The indices will say whatever benefits their power the most, regardless of truth. The fact that they are bending now to pressure is proof enough for me. We live in an age proving that valuation is just a…
Lol, the dude asking for reporting to justify his oligarch dickriding dismisses patrick boyle in his chat history as just a youtuber while using paywalled links to support his position. My theory is better because it…
Common sense and rationality says that you cant motivate rules changes simultaneously across 3 independent indices without outside pressure. Can you provide some reasoning why this wouldn’t be the obvious situation?
Please provide some support that the rule changes were proposed from within. Given the fact they tried pulling this nonsense on 3 indices, it seems very unlikely the rules changes originated from within.
You use your back channels and good ole boys club connections to try getting the rules for inclusion changed. Maybe collude would be a better verb than design? Is that your objection?
Of course; to you and me they are human. To their bosses, they are chattel. We’re getting to that attitude even in america by my ken
Look into Mick West; He cover's the common hoaxes really well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLyEO0jNt6M
Keep telling yourself that. Perhaps you want to spew some more bullshit about postmodern neomarxism like a good little JP acolyte, eh? Such a free thinker /s
quatsch trying to distract us from the epstein files.
No, i wouldn't be surprised how ignorant, selfish and deceitful other Americans are, you included. Mainstream isn't the same as right. Dude like this asshole would be fine with us keeping drinking fountains and lunch…
That reminds me: I got cajoled the other day that I need to upload my ID and ask for 5.5-Cyber access by the Codex desktop app while I was having it develop a fuzzing suite for an open source library I'm(we?) are…
I’ve always got more consistent and accurate prints out of my x1c versus the prusa mk3 i tolerated. Even just the enclosure makes the bambu experience more much more consistent in my experience
I didn’t say Prusa held the industry back; I said they sat on their haunches. Even the basic differences in stepper motors between what bambu chose and what prusa or ultimaker chose demonstrates my point. Edit: whoops!…
If no one else is willing to give a polished experience, they have no one to blame but themselves. My father doesn't want to be a 3d printer expert or filament researcher; he wants to print things in 3d as a hobby.…
so we're on the same page, here's how I read your comment: "This is a shockingly ill thought-out comment tbh." <-- the casual bigotry; "I don't want to assumr you're an LLM" <-- yes you do, dont be a dunce. this is the…
Lol
no, we're talking shit about people who express their bigotry with anticlanker sentiment, calling humans (whom they disagree with) llms.
Ah, and we now see casual bigotry emerging from the anticlanker crowd. What a shame.
yep, and when the llms can pack flatware, stamp license plates or clean bedpans, I'll argue we shouldn't have humans doing that bullshit work either.
Its only distracts the distractable. Does anyone ever read product announcement blog posts like they were great literature? Ive always just skimmed, theyve always been throwaway writing to me. I’d rather the humans…
I’ll argue mozzies are responsible for more suffering than humans any day of the week. They need to go. Lets just get our targeting good enough.
We’ll have to agree to disagree on this one; anytime someone has to scam the markets to survive it’s my opinion they deserve jail and ruination, not a harem.
With several large bets on the table with starship that have yet to play out. Remember mars by 2024? I think that was around the time they started accepting deposits on tesla semi.
Which?
Fudge, I really need to carve out time today to play with zeroserve. Very cool stuff
Quatsch. The indices will say whatever benefits their power the most, regardless of truth. The fact that they are bending now to pressure is proof enough for me. We live in an age proving that valuation is just a…
Lol, the dude asking for reporting to justify his oligarch dickriding dismisses patrick boyle in his chat history as just a youtuber while using paywalled links to support his position. My theory is better because it…
Common sense and rationality says that you cant motivate rules changes simultaneously across 3 independent indices without outside pressure. Can you provide some reasoning why this wouldn’t be the obvious situation?
Please provide some support that the rule changes were proposed from within. Given the fact they tried pulling this nonsense on 3 indices, it seems very unlikely the rules changes originated from within.
You use your back channels and good ole boys club connections to try getting the rules for inclusion changed. Maybe collude would be a better verb than design? Is that your objection?
Of course; to you and me they are human. To their bosses, they are chattel. We’re getting to that attitude even in america by my ken
Look into Mick West; He cover's the common hoaxes really well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLyEO0jNt6M
Keep telling yourself that. Perhaps you want to spew some more bullshit about postmodern neomarxism like a good little JP acolyte, eh? Such a free thinker /s
quatsch trying to distract us from the epstein files.
No, i wouldn't be surprised how ignorant, selfish and deceitful other Americans are, you included. Mainstream isn't the same as right. Dude like this asshole would be fine with us keeping drinking fountains and lunch…
That reminds me: I got cajoled the other day that I need to upload my ID and ask for 5.5-Cyber access by the Codex desktop app while I was having it develop a fuzzing suite for an open source library I'm(we?) are…
I’ve always got more consistent and accurate prints out of my x1c versus the prusa mk3 i tolerated. Even just the enclosure makes the bambu experience more much more consistent in my experience
I didn’t say Prusa held the industry back; I said they sat on their haunches. Even the basic differences in stepper motors between what bambu chose and what prusa or ultimaker chose demonstrates my point. Edit: whoops!…
If no one else is willing to give a polished experience, they have no one to blame but themselves. My father doesn't want to be a 3d printer expert or filament researcher; he wants to print things in 3d as a hobby.…