Some domain data that was way too coarse, but seemed like the right thing to query by.
I am really surprised by this, I was convinced that the table-wide capacity is re-distributed evenly across shards. Looks like you're entirely correct: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developergu... I…
For my very small-data use case I would be very happy if I could use DynamoDB as a persistent data store because the operational aspect is like ten lines of Terraform
I've been able to improve my partitioning by adding a random suffix from a small set to the key for the writes, and then just trying all suffixes for the reads. Because my work load was relatively write-heavy (used at…
Some domain data that was way too coarse, but seemed like the right thing to query by.
I am really surprised by this, I was convinced that the table-wide capacity is re-distributed evenly across shards. Looks like you're entirely correct: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developergu... I…
For my very small-data use case I would be very happy if I could use DynamoDB as a persistent data store because the operational aspect is like ten lines of Terraform
I've been able to improve my partitioning by adding a random suffix from a small set to the key for the writes, and then just trying all suffixes for the reads. Because my work load was relatively write-heavy (used at…