Or more simply... measurement is improving through higher volume of samples and sample over a larger period of time.
Since you transitively apply the credit of operating “robots on mars” to the atmospheric team, I will transitively apply my tax dollars and votes to me operating robots on mars. So all of them.
So a reasonable scientific hypothesis is one that describes “change” in a problem space with close to infinite variables? Got it. The optics of the naming of a hypothesis is counter to the philosophy at the heart…
As highly unscientific inference. Because someone put it on a graph does not make the explanation simple.
Global Warming is a failed hypothesis. I don’t think science mag got the memo that it’s failed to such a degree the hypothesis was renamed the more ambiguous Climate Change.
Or more simply... measurement is improving through higher volume of samples and sample over a larger period of time.
Since you transitively apply the credit of operating “robots on mars” to the atmospheric team, I will transitively apply my tax dollars and votes to me operating robots on mars. So all of them.
So a reasonable scientific hypothesis is one that describes “change” in a problem space with close to infinite variables? Got it. The optics of the naming of a hypothesis is counter to the philosophy at the heart…
As highly unscientific inference. Because someone put it on a graph does not make the explanation simple.
Global Warming is a failed hypothesis. I don’t think science mag got the memo that it’s failed to such a degree the hypothesis was renamed the more ambiguous Climate Change.