Congratulations Daniel, Robby and team!
It's not. Case closed.
To me it is the sad state of "design" in the valley that means "ux people are figuring out what is not important." To label them and give them a role implies that others in the org should not be thinking about this at…
step 1: actually do something and stop doing things related to the topic of doing something. step 2: keep doing that.
yeah, exactly. as a dev i'm just solidly impressed with the experiment. it seems like a fun project someone decided to tackle and did so quite well. what i think most of us want now is for the author to take it to the…
controversial as in it's an undesirable, irreversible interaction that really turns people off and critics of dcurtis's "work" were more than happy to speak out about it.
Congratulations Daniel, Robby and team!
It's not. Case closed.
To me it is the sad state of "design" in the valley that means "ux people are figuring out what is not important." To label them and give them a role implies that others in the org should not be thinking about this at…
step 1: actually do something and stop doing things related to the topic of doing something. step 2: keep doing that.
yeah, exactly. as a dev i'm just solidly impressed with the experiment. it seems like a fun project someone decided to tackle and did so quite well. what i think most of us want now is for the author to take it to the…
controversial as in it's an undesirable, irreversible interaction that really turns people off and critics of dcurtis's "work" were more than happy to speak out about it.