Is it really so uncommon for suspects of a crime to spend time in jail? I think I have read such stories without computers having anything to do with it. It's just a sensationalist spin trying to ride the AI scare.
The point is that just because you don't get paid for doing it, it doesn't mean that an activity has no value. Your entire way of thinking about economics is wrong.
Even simpler example: you don't get paid for eating food. Does that imply food has no value?
So spending time with your kids would not be worth any money to you? You are very wrong and misguided about economics. You have worked to earn money, so that you can give your family a home and be able to spend time…
Leisure time/spare time has value already. People work so that they can afford to have spare time and go on holidays. You have severe misconceptions about economics. People not having to work to survive will just lead…
What rewarding experience has zero financial value? I think you are very wrong about money.
The call center people use the computer to make excuses. And you overlook the possibility of human error without computer involvement. The classical "a black person mugged me" comes to mind. At the end of the day it is…
The problem with issues like the ones you describe is bad management. Like they may reward their police officers based on the number of arrests or "tickets", not on actual real problems solved. And the data issue is…
Even if the AI identifies many people, there still have to be humans checking them out. The limited number of humans may have more time to check each suspect out than they would have without the AI, because the AI takes…
Computers are only a tool. Humans have to make the final decisions. Under those circumstances, what exactly is the problem? I notice that all the articles warning about AI supervision never mention the error rate of…
Also, if there is higher prevalence of crime in certain areas, it makes sense to do more policing there. Now it is illegal to detect higher prevalence of crime? This is stupid.
Wait, their "solution to poverty" is to take out a Trillion Dollar loan, give everybody 1000$, then make a statistic showing everybody had at least 1000$? Yeah that's a brilliant scheme, it definitely looks like we…
A couple of billion people have also been added to the workforce at the same time.
OK - how? Safe for killing everybody, I am not sure what you have in mind? If "we" know, why do these things still exist?
Is it really so uncommon for suspects of a crime to spend time in jail? I think I have read such stories without computers having anything to do with it. It's just a sensationalist spin trying to ride the AI scare.
The point is that just because you don't get paid for doing it, it doesn't mean that an activity has no value. Your entire way of thinking about economics is wrong.
Even simpler example: you don't get paid for eating food. Does that imply food has no value?
So spending time with your kids would not be worth any money to you? You are very wrong and misguided about economics. You have worked to earn money, so that you can give your family a home and be able to spend time…
Leisure time/spare time has value already. People work so that they can afford to have spare time and go on holidays. You have severe misconceptions about economics. People not having to work to survive will just lead…
What rewarding experience has zero financial value? I think you are very wrong about money.
The call center people use the computer to make excuses. And you overlook the possibility of human error without computer involvement. The classical "a black person mugged me" comes to mind. At the end of the day it is…
The problem with issues like the ones you describe is bad management. Like they may reward their police officers based on the number of arrests or "tickets", not on actual real problems solved. And the data issue is…
Even if the AI identifies many people, there still have to be humans checking them out. The limited number of humans may have more time to check each suspect out than they would have without the AI, because the AI takes…
Computers are only a tool. Humans have to make the final decisions. Under those circumstances, what exactly is the problem? I notice that all the articles warning about AI supervision never mention the error rate of…
Also, if there is higher prevalence of crime in certain areas, it makes sense to do more policing there. Now it is illegal to detect higher prevalence of crime? This is stupid.
Wait, their "solution to poverty" is to take out a Trillion Dollar loan, give everybody 1000$, then make a statistic showing everybody had at least 1000$? Yeah that's a brilliant scheme, it definitely looks like we…
A couple of billion people have also been added to the workforce at the same time.
OK - how? Safe for killing everybody, I am not sure what you have in mind? If "we" know, why do these things still exist?