At least they don't have a big glowing apple on each side.
Why is there a new paragraph for every sentence?
I wonder how likely it is that fresh Linux installations are vulnerable in this way.
Sorry: level 3. It's the modifier that ``comes after shift'' and accesses special symbols. Some operating systems call it `option' and `alt gr'. I currently have a super on both sides and need to shift super in order to…
If it's buggy I'll stick to XMonad. What are you using now?
I tried this but found switching ttys was too easy.
> it gets quite annoying that you're having to use two different paradigms to manage windows I can imagine that EXWM eliminates the need for SUPER, which for me would free a modifier pair for a useful LVL3.
But how do I launch an application?!
So, if I understand this correctly, there are no ``workspaces'', but all X windows become EMACS buffers?
Doesn't this mean that, if EMACS freezes, your window manager freezes? How does it compare to XMonad and StumpWM?
At least they don't have a big glowing apple on each side.
Why is there a new paragraph for every sentence?
I wonder how likely it is that fresh Linux installations are vulnerable in this way.
Sorry: level 3. It's the modifier that ``comes after shift'' and accesses special symbols. Some operating systems call it `option' and `alt gr'. I currently have a super on both sides and need to shift super in order to…
If it's buggy I'll stick to XMonad. What are you using now?
I tried this but found switching ttys was too easy.
> it gets quite annoying that you're having to use two different paradigms to manage windows I can imagine that EXWM eliminates the need for SUPER, which for me would free a modifier pair for a useful LVL3.
But how do I launch an application?!
So, if I understand this correctly, there are no ``workspaces'', but all X windows become EMACS buffers?
Doesn't this mean that, if EMACS freezes, your window manager freezes? How does it compare to XMonad and StumpWM?