TLDR basically old tech is not optimized for scrapers / slurpers / etc. to the point it would take 42n to solve all possible combinations. Why? Murphy's law. Use or invent something else.
remember, its only difficult for you. at the end of the day its just 7gb of data...
it can be solved in a few days, just the OP said its ok for now
no its only difficult for you. and only at this moment... any minute now you will see the way. btw, the OP is just saying "its OK for now". And the OP is just telling us: this is what has been happening... maybe its…
using the current solution and a cache pattern doesnt solve it, but it is an "affordable" solvable problem. but first we need to ignore OP said its ok for now...
anyway, I have solved this exact scenario many times in the last 30 years... thanks for the dv
what a beehive of activity here. he said its ok for now. he said its not exactly his responsibility. and almost all the comments well..
i think its only 7gb of data total, therefore there should be a strategy to fully optimize for this deterministic scenario, like with a compiled streaming renderer... but he said its ok for now.. and anyway why should…
he said its fast enough for now actually...
"This is a real beehive of activity, Halberstram"
thanks, Kotaku is dogshhhhh
that would be hela curryketchup nice
TLDR basically old tech is not optimized for scrapers / slurpers / etc. to the point it would take 42n to solve all possible combinations. Why? Murphy's law. Use or invent something else.
remember, its only difficult for you. at the end of the day its just 7gb of data...
it can be solved in a few days, just the OP said its ok for now
no its only difficult for you. and only at this moment... any minute now you will see the way. btw, the OP is just saying "its OK for now". And the OP is just telling us: this is what has been happening... maybe its…
using the current solution and a cache pattern doesnt solve it, but it is an "affordable" solvable problem. but first we need to ignore OP said its ok for now...
anyway, I have solved this exact scenario many times in the last 30 years... thanks for the dv
what a beehive of activity here. he said its ok for now. he said its not exactly his responsibility. and almost all the comments well..
i think its only 7gb of data total, therefore there should be a strategy to fully optimize for this deterministic scenario, like with a compiled streaming renderer... but he said its ok for now.. and anyway why should…
he said its fast enough for now actually...
"This is a real beehive of activity, Halberstram"
thanks, Kotaku is dogshhhhh
that would be hela curryketchup nice