Is the utter lack of originality in this article further cause of this so-called "death of reading"? The whole thing reads like a dressed-up humble-brag of how many books the writer has (5,000).
Ensuring safety at home is the role of parents (where reasonable oversight is enough), not a paternalistic government prone to overreach. If parents themselves are generally too ignorant, then there's a much bigger…
What makes you say bizarrely? It seems normal to pursue something that could result in economic benefit, if you have the means to do so. And if there's a larger principle at stake, all the more reason.
Error on your homepage: "our's" should be "ours". :)
Someone, anyone... please patent a process to invalidate patents like these.
Serious question: How does this make it to the front page? Unless I missed something, it's a basic feature, and doesn't seem even remotely innovative.
Is the utter lack of originality in this article further cause of this so-called "death of reading"? The whole thing reads like a dressed-up humble-brag of how many books the writer has (5,000).
Ensuring safety at home is the role of parents (where reasonable oversight is enough), not a paternalistic government prone to overreach. If parents themselves are generally too ignorant, then there's a much bigger…
What makes you say bizarrely? It seems normal to pursue something that could result in economic benefit, if you have the means to do so. And if there's a larger principle at stake, all the more reason.
Error on your homepage: "our's" should be "ours". :)
Someone, anyone... please patent a process to invalidate patents like these.
Serious question: How does this make it to the front page? Unless I missed something, it's a basic feature, and doesn't seem even remotely innovative.