> I doubt it personally. This is precisely why this discussion is best never had. It’s nonsensical. It’s the stuff sci-fi writers come up with because reality doesn’t allow for it. You cannot in any way discuss any part…
Which is why the body uses those that it finds useful and absolutely murder those that it deems harmful. It’s nature. Just nature. And it’s such a nonsensical discussion to have that the only reason for it to happen at…
Food chains exist. Animals cannot give or deny consent. Certain approaches can be cruel, but not all. It’s a settled discussion, any further arguments border on the nonsensical.
> I doubt it personally. This is precisely why this discussion is best never had. It’s nonsensical. It’s the stuff sci-fi writers come up with because reality doesn’t allow for it. You cannot in any way discuss any part…
Which is why the body uses those that it finds useful and absolutely murder those that it deems harmful. It’s nature. Just nature. And it’s such a nonsensical discussion to have that the only reason for it to happen at…
Food chains exist. Animals cannot give or deny consent. Certain approaches can be cruel, but not all. It’s a settled discussion, any further arguments border on the nonsensical.