It is not open source simply because it does not conform to the OSI definition of open source [1], which is what everyone understands open source to be. This license particularly places restrictions on how the software…
I've actually learned a few little tricks reading the fucking gcc manual. If you're coding C (or C++) regularly, the manual is a good learning source and is well-written.
Behold, a free-as-in-beer, source-available program that brands itself as "free and open source". These guys' PR is trying too hard.
It is not open source simply because it does not conform to the OSI definition of open source [1], which is what everyone understands open source to be. This license particularly places restrictions on how the software…
I've actually learned a few little tricks reading the fucking gcc manual. If you're coding C (or C++) regularly, the manual is a good learning source and is well-written.
Behold, a free-as-in-beer, source-available program that brands itself as "free and open source". These guys' PR is trying too hard.