yes. users actively replicate data, not passively. they have inherent control over what they pass on. If a community doesn't want to replicate your data, then go to find one that does.
yes. 1) it would be significantly less secure - compromising either device would compromise both. Imagine an airplane with two engines that needs both to fly - a single engine plane is actually safer - because the…
correct, patchwork is the UI, ssb is the database.
you have had the same ideas as we did! this is roughly how secure scuttlebutt works.
absolutely. ssb avoids using DHT for these reasons (and to prove you can build something interesting without using them) also note: DHT: hash table, BlockChain: linked list. but there are a lot more datastructures than…
yes. users actively replicate data, not passively. they have inherent control over what they pass on. If a community doesn't want to replicate your data, then go to find one that does.
yes. 1) it would be significantly less secure - compromising either device would compromise both. Imagine an airplane with two engines that needs both to fly - a single engine plane is actually safer - because the…
correct, patchwork is the UI, ssb is the database.
you have had the same ideas as we did! this is roughly how secure scuttlebutt works.
absolutely. ssb avoids using DHT for these reasons (and to prove you can build something interesting without using them) also note: DHT: hash table, BlockChain: linked list. but there are a lot more datastructures than…