LLM is "stochastic parrot next word prediction machine"; it's just that this "stochastic parrot next word prediction machine" have proven to be smarter than most people. I mean, this already happened with AlphaGo too.
I don't understand any of this. If Claude is going to add some patterns (or some probablity distribution) in generated text, how can this not reduce code quality?
LLM is "stochastic parrot next word prediction machine"; it's just that this "stochastic parrot next word prediction machine" have proven to be smarter than most people. I mean, this already happened with AlphaGo too.
I don't understand any of this. If Claude is going to add some patterns (or some probablity distribution) in generated text, how can this not reduce code quality?