I don't understand this sentiment. Once something is automated by one person, that same work can apply to everyone. There is no reason everyone needs the skills to do that. It's the same with any other skill.…
>Obvious qualification is obvious. Don't form arguments this way. Dumping tautologies into an argument sounds childish.
They threw an open-source contributor under the bus for rejecting a pull request that changed a code comment. Knee-jerk responses are definitely part of their modus operandi.
As a non-security focused company, they probably don't think there is an issue giving so much power to one command that can be issued by a single person.
Probably not. It's usually difficult to get an engineer to waste an entire day or two visiting a university for recruiting.
I don't understand this sentiment. Once something is automated by one person, that same work can apply to everyone. There is no reason everyone needs the skills to do that. It's the same with any other skill.…
>Obvious qualification is obvious. Don't form arguments this way. Dumping tautologies into an argument sounds childish.
They threw an open-source contributor under the bus for rejecting a pull request that changed a code comment. Knee-jerk responses are definitely part of their modus operandi.
As a non-security focused company, they probably don't think there is an issue giving so much power to one command that can be issued by a single person.
Probably not. It's usually difficult to get an engineer to waste an entire day or two visiting a university for recruiting.