The criticism and correction were polite, helpful, and appropriate. The original comment is misleading. Your reply is bizarre, and seems to deliberately misread the original comment, the reply, and the context.
It's bizarre that you cite being outside at 60 degrees latitude as evidence related to high UV exposure. That's like a resident of Porto saying most people don't get frostbite walking around outside in winter...
The criticism and correction were polite, helpful, and appropriate. The original comment is misleading. Your reply is bizarre, and seems to deliberately misread the original comment, the reply, and the context.
It's bizarre that you cite being outside at 60 degrees latitude as evidence related to high UV exposure. That's like a resident of Porto saying most people don't get frostbite walking around outside in winter...