I think that should very much depend on the severity and the statistical impact of the bug. As long as the long doesn't raise the deaths-per-mile-driven number above what humans would be doing, I would say it would be…
I wonder if there would be a way to make an argument that would appeal to the public just the same: We can't add backdoors to encryption because it would endanger our children!
seems to be re-implementation of alfred with some recipes thrown in? what's the advantage over alfred?
actually it's even simpler: don't let humans drive. Even today's rudimentary driverless systems are already vastly superior to humans in terms of events per mile driven. (i.e. pedestrians killed)
While this is an interesting idea, I'm not sure such an approach is going to work long term. This establishes that nothing outside of the project has an impact on the project itself. To make a rather extreme example…
ESA is also using mumps...: http://www.intersystems.com/library/library-item/european-sp...
i actually like it as well. not too unpopular after all it seems. sure, some things are a bit ugly, and language development is largely controlled by a single company (intersystems), but especially working in healthcare…
I think that should very much depend on the severity and the statistical impact of the bug. As long as the long doesn't raise the deaths-per-mile-driven number above what humans would be doing, I would say it would be…
I wonder if there would be a way to make an argument that would appeal to the public just the same: We can't add backdoors to encryption because it would endanger our children!
seems to be re-implementation of alfred with some recipes thrown in? what's the advantage over alfred?
actually it's even simpler: don't let humans drive. Even today's rudimentary driverless systems are already vastly superior to humans in terms of events per mile driven. (i.e. pedestrians killed)
While this is an interesting idea, I'm not sure such an approach is going to work long term. This establishes that nothing outside of the project has an impact on the project itself. To make a rather extreme example…
ESA is also using mumps...: http://www.intersystems.com/library/library-item/european-sp...
i actually like it as well. not too unpopular after all it seems. sure, some things are a bit ugly, and language development is largely controlled by a single company (intersystems), but especially working in healthcare…