Insurers use stats, history, to determine future risk. Their entire business model is built up on this fact. There isn't much history or stats when it comes to this kind of research.
Software sandbox environments are far easier to manage than real world environments where life operates. I think different standards can apply.
Does it matter? It doesn't matter if an AI intended to escape, or if a human asked: testing if it escape, discovering the avenues, are how you begin to make something more secure. Also, you can't stop open source…
Sure, but in order to know security standards you have to test and validate. Everyone accepts some standard as 'secure' after rigorous testing and validation. I think we're learning the standards for sandboxxing change…
It's security research. You should want to know about all avenues of exploit regardless of intent. It's the only way to know risk.
Insurers use stats, history, to determine future risk. Their entire business model is built up on this fact. There isn't much history or stats when it comes to this kind of research.
Software sandbox environments are far easier to manage than real world environments where life operates. I think different standards can apply.
Does it matter? It doesn't matter if an AI intended to escape, or if a human asked: testing if it escape, discovering the avenues, are how you begin to make something more secure. Also, you can't stop open source…
Sure, but in order to know security standards you have to test and validate. Everyone accepts some standard as 'secure' after rigorous testing and validation. I think we're learning the standards for sandboxxing change…
It's security research. You should want to know about all avenues of exploit regardless of intent. It's the only way to know risk.