“we would be arguing”? I wouldn’t. I would argue it should be illegal for the police, media, and others who have significant roles in society to lie and that they should be criminally prosecuted. The only tragedy that I…
What is “pro-47”?
MSM is corrupt. That was the point. It does not matter the side.
The reason Chevron likely compelled the Executive Order, at least in part, is because the Trump administration likely views the ability for agencies to self-resolve ambiguities in their own rules as bad and potentially…
Chevron was outrageous from purely a legal perspective. Chevron likely caused this Executive Order and rightfully so.
This would apply only to the 15 executive departments — the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor,…
Fascinating that Trump doesn’t even come close to breaking the record. Does anyone know what the majority of the Executive Orders related to for the high-volume presidents and if those Executive Orders were eventually…
Agreed
Well, it’s going to have to pass the Elon Misk audit now. Bless his efforts.
This is definitely not accurate.
You need to be vibe checked.
Most people, based on my experience, would rather support Elon Musk than support a strategy recommended by an individual who believes that the MSM should be trusted. Not to mention that most of your sources to support…
Great question. I don’t have a good answer. Could a be a “facts and circumstances” type of legislation similar to the IRS. Many IRS rules go back to the “facts and circumstances” of a particular case to evaluate all the…
If an activity is profitable but the government can prosecute you for taking place in that activity, there in no correlation. That’s the point. Advertising was dangerous because there was a perception that the previous…
The inverse: ensure companies that are already working with companies are not leaving them for illegitimate reasons.
Agreed.
It was profitable to do so a year ago, it was simply dangerous politically. Now given Trump is in office and aligned with Musk, it’s politically beneficial. That seems to be the truth.
[flagged]
Well, if businesses had to prove that each hire is related to dei, which was the previous state of affairs, many would argue that is when evil creeps into business culture. So, it goes both ways, supposedly.
The CNBC piece omits details that other coverage has: “The trial resulted in jurors finding that while Toptal did everything of significance it was required to do under its contract with Grosz, Grosz had breached the…
“we would be arguing”? I wouldn’t. I would argue it should be illegal for the police, media, and others who have significant roles in society to lie and that they should be criminally prosecuted. The only tragedy that I…
What is “pro-47”?
MSM is corrupt. That was the point. It does not matter the side.
The reason Chevron likely compelled the Executive Order, at least in part, is because the Trump administration likely views the ability for agencies to self-resolve ambiguities in their own rules as bad and potentially…
Chevron was outrageous from purely a legal perspective. Chevron likely caused this Executive Order and rightfully so.
This would apply only to the 15 executive departments — the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor,…
Fascinating that Trump doesn’t even come close to breaking the record. Does anyone know what the majority of the Executive Orders related to for the high-volume presidents and if those Executive Orders were eventually…
Agreed
Well, it’s going to have to pass the Elon Misk audit now. Bless his efforts.
This is definitely not accurate.
You need to be vibe checked.
Most people, based on my experience, would rather support Elon Musk than support a strategy recommended by an individual who believes that the MSM should be trusted. Not to mention that most of your sources to support…
Great question. I don’t have a good answer. Could a be a “facts and circumstances” type of legislation similar to the IRS. Many IRS rules go back to the “facts and circumstances” of a particular case to evaluate all the…
If an activity is profitable but the government can prosecute you for taking place in that activity, there in no correlation. That’s the point. Advertising was dangerous because there was a perception that the previous…
The inverse: ensure companies that are already working with companies are not leaving them for illegitimate reasons.
Agreed.
It was profitable to do so a year ago, it was simply dangerous politically. Now given Trump is in office and aligned with Musk, it’s politically beneficial. That seems to be the truth.
[flagged]
[flagged]
Well, if businesses had to prove that each hire is related to dei, which was the previous state of affairs, many would argue that is when evil creeps into business culture. So, it goes both ways, supposedly.
The CNBC piece omits details that other coverage has: “The trial resulted in jurors finding that while Toptal did everything of significance it was required to do under its contract with Grosz, Grosz had breached the…