purple_turtle
No user record in our sample, but purple_turtle has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but purple_turtle has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
Yes, it is an excellent reason to discard it as a slop.
There is difference in taking pride of not knowing things and considering it as regrettable necessity.
> Properly budgeting and analyzing costs takes a lot of time For family? Not really
This post seems misplaced.
Giving access to the same info to more people is reducing privacy. I prefer to not give to even more people. In the same way as my doctor knowns some private health info but to keep it private I would prefer to not give…
Giving access to the same info to more people is reducing privacy. I prefer to not give to even more people.
Some banks at least are selling customer data.
I am still waiting for something that would support your claim rather than mention something sort - of - related.
Links to materials that would support your claim. And at least mention terms you used.
No, ones that would support your claim. And at least mention terms you used.
Can you link any evidence supporting this claim? This term sounds like a standard-issue woo.
Can you link any evidence supporting this claim?
Your first linked page has no word "depression" on it
Note that I am not saying that "throw away regulation, always less regulation is better". That would be asking to drop all regulations. I am saying that regulations have cost so you should have as little as regulation…
Sadly, sometimes people are wrong. This applies also to enacting monstrously stupid regulations. Or even ones that were introduced entirely as revenge or to create opportunity for corruption.
2026?
> this is a greed problem. Also that. But overregulation makes too hard for others to compete and offer cheaper insulin.
What is the point of car that on Mondays changes colour to blue and on each first Friday of the year explodes? If neither you not anyone else can fix it, without more cost than making a proper one?
> It's not that we never need less regulation this would be going against > 'we need less regulation' is never the right answer
I am not going to collect old clothes (used as rags and ready to be thrown out) for months. For start, my flat is not large enough for that. I just throw them away with rubbish and get less supportive of people and…
Less regulation is a good target. Just not sole one. Harm reduction (a good reason for regulation) also needs to be balanced with it. But piles of regulation have costs - both in reduction of competitiveness, increasing…
> 'we need less regulation' is never the right answer Sometimes it is. For example some countries had or have regulation that only nobles can work in specific professions or wear specific clothes or live in specific…
> LLM is a lookup table which tells you "if the last N tokens were s_1, s_2, ..., s_N, then the following token will be t_1 with probability p_1, t_2 with probability p_2, etc...". No, LLM is not a lookup table for all…
> The last 30 years have been dominated by deregulation Maybe in USA, and not everywhere. From what I heard deregulation had not happened in USA healthcare. And describing last 30 years in EU as dominated by…
This one is about housing crisis, not "western homeless crisis". At least in Europe it is not (yet?) causing very large scale of homelessness problem.