> This post is for paid subscribers Thanks, I feel so enlightened
Good for you, but a man with self-induced gynecomastia who wears dresses doesn't stop being a man. It comes across like you have some very sexist and restrictive (little box) ideas about what "man" means.
You're still a man though. Messing with your hormones doesn't alter that reality.
> that's more of "having no sense of other people's privacy" Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
In the USA, you mean.
Incidentally, this dialogue works equally well, if not better, with David Chalmers versus B.F. Skinner, as with the Simpsons characters.
> New function attribute null_terminated_string_arg(PARAM_IDX) for indicating parameters that are expected to be null-terminated strings. Why is this not a type attribute?
Wow, so the multi-hour package conflict resolution I am going through RIGHT NOW on my 2004 laptop is completely pointless? Good to know.
No, they were always rather poor. It’s you who’s matured enough to notice.
Politicians are tools as well. In more than one sense.
That’s pretty generous. https://qntm.org/clean
No, you don’t. Seven, plus or minus two at best.
Only as inevitable as the dearth of interpolation/parametrized query primitives… though whether the industry has actually learnt the bitter lessons of SQL injection remains to be seen. I don’t hold my hopes up too much.
> It seems your Javascript is turned off. Maybe you'd prefer the RSS feed? Ruined indeed.
As long as it’s prohibitively expensive for their competition, I’m sure they don’t mind.
TermKit?
I can't wait for crypto miners in pure CSS ^W Houdini
CSS calls something completely different "inheritance". There is no class inheritance in CSS, because CSS classes are not OOP classes.
Nobody calls it this, because it is not. CSS classes have nothing to do with OOP other than the word "class".
> treat their employees like they do their customers So, with disdainful indifference?
It's not like the algorithm itself is the most valuable part here, as opposed to active maintainership.
> (a) […] (2) […] (d) […] Looks like the kind of error a low-parameter LLM would make
Ever heard of banking apps?
Is this the kind of scam I am thinking of?
English is indeed a well intentioned error, but why does SQL look like that?
> This post is for paid subscribers Thanks, I feel so enlightened
Good for you, but a man with self-induced gynecomastia who wears dresses doesn't stop being a man. It comes across like you have some very sexist and restrictive (little box) ideas about what "man" means.
You're still a man though. Messing with your hormones doesn't alter that reality.
> that's more of "having no sense of other people's privacy" Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
In the USA, you mean.
Incidentally, this dialogue works equally well, if not better, with David Chalmers versus B.F. Skinner, as with the Simpsons characters.
> New function attribute null_terminated_string_arg(PARAM_IDX) for indicating parameters that are expected to be null-terminated strings. Why is this not a type attribute?
Wow, so the multi-hour package conflict resolution I am going through RIGHT NOW on my 2004 laptop is completely pointless? Good to know.
No, they were always rather poor. It’s you who’s matured enough to notice.
Politicians are tools as well. In more than one sense.
That’s pretty generous. https://qntm.org/clean
No, you don’t. Seven, plus or minus two at best.
Only as inevitable as the dearth of interpolation/parametrized query primitives… though whether the industry has actually learnt the bitter lessons of SQL injection remains to be seen. I don’t hold my hopes up too much.
> It seems your Javascript is turned off. Maybe you'd prefer the RSS feed? Ruined indeed.
As long as it’s prohibitively expensive for their competition, I’m sure they don’t mind.
TermKit?
I can't wait for crypto miners in pure CSS ^W Houdini
CSS calls something completely different "inheritance". There is no class inheritance in CSS, because CSS classes are not OOP classes.
Nobody calls it this, because it is not. CSS classes have nothing to do with OOP other than the word "class".
> treat their employees like they do their customers So, with disdainful indifference?
It's not like the algorithm itself is the most valuable part here, as opposed to active maintainership.
> (a) […] (2) […] (d) […] Looks like the kind of error a low-parameter LLM would make
Ever heard of banking apps?
Is this the kind of scam I am thinking of?
English is indeed a well intentioned error, but why does SQL look like that?